Fashy Women are Wealthy Women

Capitalist, materialist 'women' who give into the media brainwash and superficial/Satanic lifestyle of popular culture end up spending a lot of money to their own detriment. Women who wear make-up, who are on contraceptives, or who drink or smoke regularly or casually are impoverishing themselves and their future children (if they have any) all for the glory of selfishness and love of the world. I've looked up a few things online that show how much money a fascist woman with a stoic/Christian ideology vs a feminist/capitalist/materialist ideology save or spend in their lifetimes.

Women who wear make-up and beauty products will spend an average of $15,000 in their lifetimes. A woman who does not take part in the high competition, the superficiality of a false face and the psy-op that is 'fashion' and the horrid make-up industry will not be spending this, or will only have a few products, which might come up to a whopping $2000 in their lifetimes (if I calculate a bottle of nail polish, a couple eyeliner sticks and normal hydration face cream).

Chemical contraception is unnatural and unholy, as well as difficult on the body and is sold as healthy and safe. My mother couldn't have children normally because contraceptives ruined her body and I was born in vitro. Contraceptives actually do make women unattractive and crazy! A woman can spend around $30,000 on pills and rings and other disgusting forms of hormonal contraception.

Cigarettes are unhealthy and make you look trashy and sick. A woman who smokes will spend around $106,000 in her lifetime, compared to a woman who does not touch cigarettes at all.

Alcohol isn't always bad, but it should be drunk on special occasions only, not for a buzz, not to 'take you away' or 'lower your stress'. It is poison, a dangerous poison and it can cost a woman up to $78000 in her lifetime if she makes it into a bad habit.

Poor eating habits, like eating junk food and buying unhealthy chain restaurant foods can rank up the lifetime bill from $24,000 to $240,000 depending on how obese the woman is or becomes. If we were to average that out and be nice to a certain extent, we would get to $100,000 of extra calories, fat, sugar and general eaten trash the capitalist system tempts us with.

Clothes shopping or 'going on a shopping spree' is often something women do when they feel prideful and refuse to be humble about their appearance or the unfortunate way their life is going. This is because they have built their house on the sand. These reasons why women shop are horrendous and childish. These sorts of women will spend $100-$300 a month on ugly clothes and useless superficial accessories, which equates to $120,000 in their lifetimes on average. A more conscious woman will sew her own clothes or buy second-hand or buy clothes and wear them out before buying more. I know I spend maybe $100 a year on new clothes and that depends on the year. I do buy good shoes that last me, and I try to get good clothes as well, which stretches out the cost. A more conscious women could spend $10,000-$30,000 in her lifetime that would probably be more than enough.

All in all, if a woman has bad habits like smoking and drinking and buys useless clothes, eats out, wears make-up and sterilizes her fertile body with hormones, she will spend around $450,000 in her lifetime on useless superficiality and her selfish pride. A women not bound to the temptations of capitalism, who is stoic or Christian will spend perhaps $25,000 if I add in the luxury of nice clothes (which shows dignity and well-deserved beauty) and a few dates with the husband once in a while, as well as a few cosmetics. The fact that a fashy woman would save $425,000 means that that money could be invested into education for their children, a piece of land or larger estate to ensure their children's future, or make sure their children will have trust funds in order to make sure they are never debt slaves. There are other ways of saving and other gross things women spend money on. It's important to be conservative and be extremely conscious of everything we purchase and not to think of ourselves. Material and possessions do not express who we are, and what we represent. They are devoid of meaning and I personally start to hate how much I care about certain things I have.

The Alt-Right Isn't Just Trump Supporters

It is a disturbing thing that recently I was told that my blog seemed to be written by a Jew because I said moderate things like 'perhaps have Muslims in Canada controlled by secular separation laws could help weed out Marxist zeitgeist and that's not 100% terrible' and 'mixed people can still fit in and they're not the norm so we shouldn't persecute them'. I spend a lot of time in the circlejerk of Twitter's extreme radical Alt-Right, which is a pleasure and a curse. Compared to the intellectual neoreactionaries, Twitter is full of deep south KKK and ultra-racist who are ready to spew out 'hang all the niggers' at the first opportunity. Those people make me feel ashamed to be Alt-Right because I know that racism is a pillar to our foundation and so is stigmatization, but I actually truly hate to see it in action. This is mainly because I am a woman and I have stronger empathy than men concerning 'others' outside my religion, race and sex. Hence why I think some of the best MRA's are women (Karen Straughn for example). But I digress, I return to post a few posts after a long hiatus of intense wifery, mothering and listening to vaporwave while cooking up pumpkin treats for my hardworking husband.

Recently, I've been feeling alienated from the way the MSM calls anything 'Alt-Right' part of 'Trump Supporters'. Personally, I do 'support' Trump on some of his policies, but not as much for others. I am against his environmental policies, because I am an environmentalist, and I think he's seriously in bed with some powerful Jews. It make me believe that the MSM wants to make the public think that the Alt-Right is a small, puny group of less than a million people. Honestly, the KKK at its peak went up to 2 million (in the 30's). Will we surpass this number with our new white nationalist/supremacist movement? I don't know, but with the internet, movements can take on new flairs and shapes more appealing to many, creating flavours and cults for numerous types of whites that are tired of being demographically replaced in their own countries. Personally, I like the Nazi flavour. I am a Hitler supporter first and the MSM does not want the public to understand this, to know this kind of flavour of white nationalism. I think we all have been brought together by Pepe (or Kek) in a time where there was a need to spread a sense of identity and community that was solely needed. For me, a Canadian, I have no cultural identity, no national identity, and I live amongst people like Muslims who do, only they are in my land. Our governments have been spoiling out history and sense of determination for years and now we are 'post-national' which is taking a step toward one of the first globalist nations. Yeah, the crime rate is still pretty low, and people say it's because Canada is tolerant, but this moment is a calm before a storm. More will come and the anti-racist, white-hate zeitgeist will take its full form and the Aryan race in Canada will suffer the might of Islam, and low IQ of the sons of Ham. It might take another 20-30 years, but white will be a minority in Canada and Canada will fall if we do not take serious action within the next 10-15 years. I think the movement is happening, and I think more and more people are understanding the failure of democracy, the need for a leader who loves the land and the people who made Canada the wonderful country it was before we stopped replacing ourselves.

To a certain extent, yes, I blame women's liberation. Third-wave feminism is the epitome of disgusting, degenerate and abhorrent to any woman who has dignity and integrity. Women's empowerment is not leading our societies toward utopias, it's making our societies fall. It's already too late and much like the fall of Adam and Eve, it was Adam who gave into the fruit of Eve's whiles who is responsible. Western men should have never bent to the will of the women, but should have asserted their position as dignified, beautiful and something men cannot fully do. Now, in a feminist world, the women like me who are red pilled, have to deal having to exclude normies as friends because they so nonchalantly say: 'If I'd be pregnant now, I'd get an abortion'. *Sigh*

With Canada socially divided so much that there is absolutely no social cohesion (and this will grow), I have to flock to the nearest and biggest moral group there is and that to me, is my church. I do to an Anglican fundamentalist church where almost 80% of people are creationists. Christians in the Alt-Right are their own flavour, often Catholic, which isn't real Christianity, but has its own beauty, white merits and authoritarian positions (which is why I think people like it). I doubt a Catholic theocracy would ever happen and I think it would probably be a terrible thing, except I think we are seriously going to need a Crusade 2.0. 

And while many of these sub-groups of nationalistic Canadians, or Christians, or white people who are tired of having to self-hate to receive the love of other fellow ethnomasochists. Love God, not the world! Love God, not man! Love God, not the self! I think there is a growing amount of Canadian paleo-cons or Alt-Right emerging, disgusted by Social Democracy, feminism, Islam and other absolutely degenerate filth. The far-right is here and we're ready for anything. We don't care about Trump, we care about the white race, we care about our own politics, we care about giving a national identity to our children, to have social cohesion.

Feminists: Red Pill or Sterilize

As much as I wish feminists would realize that the way they see the world is not so far off to how we see the world and then break free from their anger, I would also like to see them not have any children. There is some similarities between sex-negative feminism and the Alt-Right. The only difference is patriarchy. Anyone on the right is willing to accept the patriarchy, and has made peace with it. Western Women, however strong the patriarchy, have the freedom to have a job, to choose her mate, to go on birth control, and to have a general safe environment to live in. For feminists, this isn't enough. Let's not get into sex-positive feminism because it's just degenerate and rather distasteful to speak about at this point. Sex-negative feminists are angry at a system they believe in white male-run, when we are both targeting the same Jewish system. It's not white males that own most corporations, that desire to cause degeneracy in the world, that teach women it's all right to be a sex object, that it's powerful to be sexually promiscuous, to be a prostitute, etc It's the Jews. I do think that intersectionality was funded and executed by Jews, in order to target white men, the founders of the West, in order to seed this social anarchy that we see so prominently today.

But I digress.

Feminists, and I used to be one, so I know this quite well, think that men are all raised to hate women, to think women are inferior, and grow up watching porn, their parents apathetic to this, and then are taught that all women want to be fucked by men really badly so much that they don't need consent and can all just rape women and it's all right.
Well, there's a bit right there. Pornography, which is total and utter degeneracy, ruins young growing men's minds, destroys their chances at a healthy sexuality, and poisons their view of women. We agree here. We also agree that rape is degenerate, savage and scavenger behaviour, and we need to abolish it. So we agree.

But feminists want to reform men. They want men to stop objectifying women, which we know is impossible. They don't want to be in a patriarchy because they have a deep distrust of the patriarchy simply because they believe it values men and not women, or men more and women less. This is where we differ. Women on the right are highly valued, and have high expectations, expectations that now are lower because of the amount of fell women in our midst. To me, a woman who is family-oriented, who does not perform social activism, who does not have a degree in Gender Studies, who does not victimize herself and seeks a strong, dominant and ambitious man as her mate meets the expectations (later will become a mother of children and be a housewife is preferable). Is this so difficult to be in this day and age? It seems to easy to become pregnant these days. It seems like people are constantly attempting to love women and love femininity and yet, no one cares about being a good wife, a supporting female partner to a career-oriented man, a mother, an educator, a resources manager, a cook and all the wonderful 50's things that women were cherished for being.

Sociopathic Tendencies

Recently I've been dealing with paranoia concerning the way I analyze people and gauge a response. I'm not a sociopath but my moral compass has been poisoned by the influence of evil when I was an SJW, so I know what what it's like to be morally lost and lost in the certainty of an ideology. As a cute, female child I was a pathological liar and got away with absolutely everything. I stopped being like this because of the countless amount of times it came back to me sooner or later in some way. Still, my novels are full of romanticized sociopaths and psychopaths, because I feel attuned to a chaotic neutral alignment. Now I know that it really does describe madmen, and I find that it's part of being an artist, but it's no way to function in society.

My sociopath tendencies are my obsession why the 'why' people are a certain way. I tend to desire to analyze how people think and to plan responses in advance in order to please them in a controlled, tested kind of way. I do this sometimes without thinking, sometimes in a very calculated way. As a woman, this is my 'forté' but in a horrid way, clearly. While the dark power of men resides in their bodies, the dark power of women emerges from the pool of chaotic energy that has a talent at recognizing people's face, the emotional aura of situations and to act accordingly. A woman can make you feel horrible about yourself, your life, and your relationship with her in seconds. Her use of black magic is a powerful weapon and a protective mechanism against the bodies of men. So, if I feel unsafe, I will tend to make myself look small, unimportant, but also overly nice and busy. It will come naturally, especially if I'm with my son. If I feel offended, or provoked by a conversation I am having with a friend, I will attempt to understand their mentality and either mirror it or perhaps slightly calculate how I can slip into her psyche and reorganize her brain. This is a very cool one.

Emotionally manipulating women can be either really tough or really easy. Women tend to be overly emotional, so it's important to have just the most neutrality possible and insert so much nuance that she's really confused about her views of morality. This mainly applies to morally relative people. You kind of nonchalantly slip in a view, suppose you're against abortion.

"It's not that I'm against women having abortions, I just find that it's really unfair to end the life of a person before it's really started. If I would be that fetus and I could be conscious, I wouldn't want to die. I would be abhorred to know that my mother didn't love me and had someone murder me in the womb, a place of safety and security. How... how is that not infanticide?"

Passing the Baton to the "Oppressed"

I know this is over-dealt with but I can never keep in the thought: what have men not done that women could do? Why do we need to 'let women try to rule the world'? Saying that means that people believe women to be superior to men that men have not done what needs to be done, that men have been lacking, that they've missed something. This is very difficult to believe. I doubt women will bring anything new to the table--if things go well for women in power, the best thing that could happen would be that women will keep the status quo that men have fought and died to obtain and conserve.

What about black women? I watched this video and it made me think about what it would be like to pass the baton not only to women but to black women. I've read a lot on how black women act and why they act in a clownish fashion, videos by black men who claim that black women compensate for their lack of beauty and popularity with acting in order to get people's attention. Black women will do anything to stand out, be seen as different and unique hence the attitude and bizarre over-the-top emotions and reactions. Leslie Jones was the epitome of this stereotype in the movie Ghostbusters. Nero called the act racist to the level of minstrels (black face) and I have to agree. Black women appropriate this because it is a very real stereotype, archetype even at this point. What I find ridiculous is what white male announcer (virtue-signalling cuck) says to her:

 "A lot of people starting attacking you on Twitter using some pretty awful terminology and I was very proud of you, knowing you, you'd stand up for yourself when that happened, and then you used Twitter as a form (forum?) to draw attention to it and uhh um... maybe this is going to be the beginning of some progress towards what happens on Twitter." 

First of all... he's barely literate. Is he trying to lower himself to her level? At one point refers to her indirectly by saying "people like you". Way to other blacks in the left by cloaking yourself in virtue. The beginning of progress? No, it's the continuation of the coddling. It's the rise of censorship, of a big government and a police state. But we know all this. This is clearly a bad interview and the whole Leslie Jones issue is stupid. It's just interesting to see what kinds of things would likely happen if black women were in power. White men would cuck themselves into attempting to to just to minorities who, if ever they grab a hold of the train that runs society, would crash it on purpose and then claim justice, freedom and hope.  

Social Monopolies

Feminism does not have a monopoly on equality. Equality is often defined as 'the equal opportunity for a woman to make the same choices and decisions as a man'. Often Marxists will attempt to easily convert people to feminism by using the phrase 'who believes that a woman should have the equal opportunities?' Clearly if you don't raise your hand under that sort of pressure, (even if you could explain your reasoning) you will be socially ostracized.

Social ostracism is not a big deal for men, but for women, it is. I hate confrontation, I think it's a man's thing, but I will take my place if it is needed. I say it's not a big deal for men because men thrive in the public sphere, often do not bend to emotional mindgames as easily, remain stable while defending their arguments and gain friends and babes from being outgoing and sometimes fringey. Women don't do as well. A right-wing woman in a Marxist college will be looked at contemptuously by leftist men and women, and since the right-wing men are in a minority, she's left on her own, which is a difficult weight to bear.

With PC culture, women lose. 

Bringing Back: Etiquette Schools

In attempt to rebuild a healthy, homosocial gathering for young women and girls, I believe it would be a wise thing to bring back etiquette schools. They are now few and often tailored to modern society. I, as a hardcore traditionalist, believe that we can do-away with much of social media and technology and their failings. I do believe young women (17+) may wish to have a Facebook or a cell phone, but I would recommend that they do not use them for anything else than communication with the world. There is no need for them to be toxified by Buzzfeed, Twitter, Tumblr, Yahoo, MSN, etc. If any website would be acceptable for young women these days, it would be YouTube (although it's being censored) Reddit (in moderation) or Pinterest. Still, I do believe parents should be involved in their children's feast of ideas, asking them if they have seen something disturbing or that they are questioning. But I digress.

Society today is secular, highly immoral, unconcerned with spirituality, uncouth and ultra-liberal. In order to counteract this 'Slut Culture' of fallen women, we must salvage the younger generation and make them once more into women with class and dignity. Christian, moral, elite, conservative girls might be able to be the future that will help this world return to Truth, morality, and peace. Instead of falling into despair in an eschatological depression, let us look into ways to row to shore the girls who will inevitably drive down the waterfall of sin.

Etiquette schools should focus mainly on:

(Indoor Activities)

Conversation, Socialization, Games, DIY, paperwork (taxes, etc), table manners, hosting, music, painting, sewing, cooking, canning, exercize and literature (as well as Bible Study).

These activities will create wonderful, sturdy, joyful girls who will see the value of being a housekeeper. This does not force them into being a wife and housekeeper, however, she should be free to go on to do some higher education if she so chooses (perhaps in medicine or education), but she will be suited well to her femininity and should not wish to be a man, or masculine more than her disposition might incline her to be.

(Outdoor Activities) might include:

Horseback riding, gardening, gathering, non-violent sports, swimming, and free play. 

I do believe girls should be left along in order to breed 'romantic' relationships with each other. Women can be very homosocial and intimate with each other, I believe this is why many of them fall into desiring to be sexual with each other, but I do find that falling into lust is immoral and breaks the potential for a perfect intimate friendship. Older girls and younger girls should be imaginative and play wonder games, make plays, read or invent stories with each other.

I believe etiquette schools could be made into summer camps. I would host one if I had the budget and location and well... girls who would like to to this, but the only problem is that the discipline that is needed is no longer tolerated in our society. We cannot shame and humiliate anymore, and by that, I don't mean it in a 'hazing' type of way. I mean it like, make them stand in a corner wearing a dunce hat, or such a thing. Humiliation can be done right, shaming is highly needed in order to correct false ways and return to a healthy social stigma. Will we ever see this? Likely not. But it's nice to imagine. I will keep dreaming in a positive light.

"To despair is to turn your back on God." Marilla Cuthbert

Mothers are Women, Girls are Girls

When I was pregnant, two years ago, I told a woman in my class that I really felt like I was becoming a woman. She looked at me funny and said: "Surely you don't mean that women need to have children to be women...?"
I felt undermined and insulted, because she was a feminist and I knew what she stood for but not completely at the time. I had to be subdued. It bothered me.

NRx Misogyny Apology

I did some reconnaissance recently, and delved into some pretty good arguments against the Alt-Right. Apart from the anti-large-CEO image the technocrats give off, there was the obvious reoccuring theme of 'racism' but also 'sexism'. I was a bit puzzled, but then it became clear to me. Yes, the author of this article was a feminist (I'm reviewing the article now, it'll be up soon) a male feminist, to be precise, or perhaps he was just fond of loose girls he can easily have sex with. The guy seemed like he had done a bit of research, but focused far too much on the biography of certain big names, and it ended up being more tedious than interesting. Not much is interesting these days apart from the reactosphere, honestly. But back to the point... sexism.

Horrible Advice for Men from Childish Women

I saw this terrible article today, I am so ashamed. It's from a random website but its regressiveness is astounding. It's regressive for society, for women, it's just gross. It's a list of 16 Phrases Women say Men Misunderstand. It should read: Vague Things Women say that they Expect men to Understand. I hear myself saying these things sometimes and I find it really detrimental to the communication I have with my husband. It's bad programming and it has to stop. Here's the list:

http://www.dailyforest.com/entertainment/11-things-women-say-that-men-misunderstand/6

The link follows to page 6 because it is the worst of them all.
'“Do you need to do that now?” then your response should be simple: “No, you’re right, I don’t”'

The New Scoundrel

Is it sad that I think white supremacists are bad boys? Not all of them, but there is a niche of WS of gentlemanly, virtuous and brilliant men who show more love and care of women than feminists do. I don't want to get into contempt (and clearly the Alt-Right needs self-awareness concerning it) but once you do your homework, you realize that there is a lot of truth to what the Alt-Right is fighting for. But without getting into that, there is a lot of female appeal to the Alt-Right, and this gentlemanly type of man.

1. The Alt-Right is not afraid to say that which is difficult to be said by the average person. This breach of care, this forwardness alone is attractive.

Sexual Liberation is Patriarchal

“Birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race.” --Margaret Sanger

Apart from the fact that sexual liberation is the activation of passions of the flesh, which is outright degenerate and undignified, it's also incredibly patriarchal. The West is not patriarchal because it is secular. There are men who govern laws, and the West has survived mainly because there were no abortions and people used to be religious. In a sense, there was a slight 'Patriarchy' because women need control in a civilization due to their nature to want to breed with the strongest player. At war, single women will jump onto the invader and breed, not on the men fighting for her.

O'Canada--The Cuckland

Justine Trudeau, former substitute high school drama teacher, has decided to go full retard feminist and change the lyrics to 'O Canada' to be gender neutral. I say it was because insecure feminists were being triggered. I'm going to give three reasons why this is a bad idea.

1. Justin is a cuck and now Canada is a cuck. While the left boasts about how 'good' we look to the 'rest of the world', realistically, the rest of the world is either being controlled by the wealthy and the 0.01% or is an ultra-masculine Middle East that wants to rape Canada. Already that Justin Trudeau doesn't value his land and sells each log from our precious forests for 0.50$ each (disgusting!), he also doesn't care at all about his people because there was no democratic vote on the anthem change. I know a lot of people hated the change and that's disrespectful to your people. While Justine thinks he's doing the right thing, he keeps on saying things like 'It's the current year' and 'We're on the right side of history'. Cuck country of the West will also be harbouring Syrian refugees and I SWEAR as soon as they come here, I am carrying pepper spray and a switch blade around with me and will be encouraging girls to do so. I don't want to fearmonger, but after Germany and Sweden... you fucking touch my milky skin, and I'll shiv you. Anyway, *fluffs hair* it's a bad idea because it demeans the actual desires of the population and the change was undemocratic and ideological--while there should be a separation of church and state, feminism, as an ideology, should be considered a religion and therefore the change of the Canadian anthem is almost a religious change.

2. No one cares about the 'sons' in the song because we're white westerners and 50% of the population are women. We're pretty fucking safe, we're one of the  safest country in the world. Just because people have sexual insecurities and feel raped by their choices doesn't make 1 in 4 college women raped. We don't live in an oppressive patriarchy. The patriarchy of the feminist is a real bogeyman, it's not real. We are in a patriarchy, but the workings and understandings of that statement is too difficult and complex for the mind of the SJW. This is a pragmatic reason: no one cares or feels empowered in a patriarchal way--or feels oppressed by the lack of the female gender apart from feminists who want female supremacy (which leads to the end of a civilization). 

3. The hardliner, the motherload, here it is: sons are in command of a nation and should be. If women would rule nations, nations would fall. Mother Merkel is committing German suicide, and the migrants coming in her country and raping young girls are all reading Mein Kampf. Matriarchies have happened, but only at the end of Empires right before their total downfall. Theodora of Byzantium promoted the liberation of women and sexual empowerment (not in the same ways as feminists due today) and it was suitable for a dying Empire only. Well, we are in a dying Empire, unless Trump can do something about it. This reason is uncomfortable but true: women should not play a role in the building and the upkeeping of a nation. But should focus their energy on raising children, caring for the sick, the young and the elderly. I want men to rule. I don't even want to vote anymore--I'll end up voting conservative next election, fuck, I'd take Harper back!

Also, and this is a postscript reason but it sounds terrible. In all of us command? Who wrote it? It sounds awful and disturbing and stupid, and embarrassing.

Great Article Responding to Black Pigeon Speaks

I found this response on TradYouth to Black Pigeon Speaks' video on how women's role in politics negatively effect healthy civilization. http://www.tradyouth.org/2016/02/jews-destroy-women/ It is about the powerful elite and it fine-tunes the video. Enjoy! BPS's video is also on the page.

Excerpt:

"Were young women given complete sexual liberation but afforded a truthful and complete stock of the situation, they would make less degenerate choices. They’re repeatedly lied to about the situation. They’re led to believe that their fertility remains reliable well into their forties. They’re led to believe that they can ambitiously pursue a career and achieve a quality man and traditional family. Hollywood confirms that quality providers will gladly wait for them to finish riding the carousel. They’re led to believe that the contraceptives they’re eagerly offered are completely safe and don’t have grave effects on their hormone levels and future fertility."

Ban of Feminine Hygiene Tax--Poor Economic Liberal Choice

On July 1st, feminist Prime Minister Justin Trudeau made a very poor economic move to satisfy the shrill Banshees of third-wave feminism. I remember it being a topic on why we need feminism. Here are the approximate figures of this liberal choice.
The government will lose 140 400 000 $ to 280 800 000 $ a year over the ban on tampon tax. This is one-hundred and forty to two-hundred and eight million dollars in taxes. So, women, you were giving around 5 to 10$ a year to the government so you can have the luxury of polluting the world with tampons and pads made probably by children in factories, but nooooo I need that 5-10$ to indulge my fat acceptance craving.

This is a bit cucky of me to post this, but keep in mind that Canada has Quebec in it, which carries a huge load of burden and to strip away that tax means that Canada will fall even deeper into economic failure. I guess, in a way, this should valorize my sense of nationalism and perhaps we are to see a referendum to move out of Canada if the economy is still super bad. Honestly there are plenty of things we could do to help support our economy without Justin and I'd love to have Françoise David as my Quebec PM. She fucking rules.

The Role of Women in Nazi Germany

"Women were not expected to wear make-up or trousers. The dyeing of hair was not allowed nor were perms. Only flat shoes were expected to be worn. Women were discouraged from slimming as this was considered bad for child birth. Women were encouraged to have a well built figure as slim women, so it was taught, would have problems in pregnancy…….Women were also discouraged from smoking – not because it was linked to problems with pregnancies – but because it was considered non-German to do so." 

C N Trueman "The Role of Women in Nazi Germany"
historylearningsite.co.uk. The History Learning Site, 9 Mar 2015. 7 Jul 2016.

Women Power is Not In Feminism--It's in Conservatism

There is a minority of activist women in America who identify as Christian (seriously) and/or Conservative. They want to reclaim the word 'feminist'. Personally, on a side-note, I would like to coin the word Femalist, those who care about the female sex, about reproduction, female beauty, humility and sacrifice. These feminists call third-wave mainstream feminists 'fauxminists' as they devaluing the true nature of women. Now I'm not going to make an argument from nature, because that's an endless cycle of bullshit. I'm going to make the argument from God. Woman arose from the earth. Female. She who bears fruit in her womb.

Food for Thought

If America (Canado-American culture) is so corrupt... why do people want to immigrate here? We're a rape culture. We are patriarchal and non-equal. We are sexually repressed and way too traditional. Wow, it sounds like a great fucking place for Muslims, does it?

White Genocide

"Demographics will dictate the values a society holds." --Black Pigeon Speaks 

Right now, we are facing mass terrorism in the middle-east, to the civilians of those countries by Islamist men. The women in Islam are oppressed, seriously; they have no say in the politics of Sharia and how radical Islam has become. That terror is rising to Europe. Germany and Sweden are main targets, the latter now devastated by a rise in rape/sexual assault by 100% from Muslim migrants (legal ones) onto young Swedish women. Their governments are silent. They do not use military action against the migrants, they do not make laws to protect them from acting out furthermore. They are insane by anarchic notions of freedom and cultural relativity. All of this is propagated by the fear of words, or Political Correctness, which is the main talking point on the agenda of Cultural Marxism. Political Correctness (see list here) is one of the foundational stones of Cultural Marxism. Not only is Political Correctness encouraged, it is enforced. Any word that people employ that does not conform to this new secular Religion is automatically corrected by the CM Gestapo, which are now called Social Justice Warriors or (SJW's) for short. Their title is a misnomer, these people are the intolerant, bigoted (and they love using that word against people) and incredibly self-righteous. They are also blind. Blind to other perspectives, blind to politics and economy. I've heard theories that they are the drones of the Illuminati, a group known for its feminism, secular humanism, and openness about sexuality. That's not even far-fetched for a conspiracy, it's a reality. 

Traditionalists and a bit of Jesus

This might come off as really mean, but think of this. All those gender-queer, trans-whatever people who don't want kids and won't have kids because they're going to have their sexual organs removed, their genes are going to die. Those who will have children will be what trans-queer-gender-different and feminists call "traditionalists". These "traditionalists" are men who like women who want children and a family, and women who like men who want children and a family. These people come together and share their lives, so that they can have moral support from the loyal, loving partners, as well as time-sharing, so that the most work can be done the most efficiently. Team work makes the dream work and trust me, it does. What pisses me off and numerous people around me about this is that it is almost shunned by women and 'free women' and feminists that I don't sleep with many people, or have a career. I have a baby son, and people would ask me as I am heavily pregnant if I was going to have an abortion. When I denied them, frowning, (because I'm way too pregnant for you to be asking me this and to be asked that when you are waiting for your baby miracle is like being asked someone when they're going to murder their own child. When?) they were shocked! You're 22! You're just starting your life and you want to have responsibility?