Beta Male Brainwashes Children into SJWism

I was quite horrified recently when I found that in my province there was an event being planned called 'Philosophy for Children'. The man who organizes it, if I am able to call him a man without giggling, has a bit more meat on his body than a skeleton and seems to be into circus and artsy things. I will not name the group that he is organizing this event with, but here is the text.

Racial Preference

Today, as I started writing my Honours thesis on SJWism, I came upon the words 'racial preference'. It puzzled me. After all, people have sexual preferences, and if I accept that one can be gay or bisexual or pansexual or a unicorn, then I can speak of this freely.

Take Norman. He has sexual feelings for men. His society tells him it is all right for him to prefer men sexually and so has a romantic relationship with another man. He chooses this, and he can also not control his sexual impulse he has for other men. He will say, despite his obvious choice of being with a man romantically, that he cannot control it, and that he did not choose it.

He has a lack of agency, which he gives up to lust as a sacrificial offering. He cannot control it and therefore, people must accept the way he is or else they are 'scared' of him. Hmm...

Why should people, then, not be proud of their racial preferences? Why is it that if a white person desires to be surrounded by other white people because 1. they cannot control their kinship for other whites and 2. they simply prefer it then they must reform the way that they are against their will for the sake of multiculturalism and the removal of all racial bias?

Why must those who have a positive racial bias toward their own race be forced to reject their nature? It's simple: because it is not 'natural' to have racial preferences to 'society', but a prejudice. Would a gay man, however, be called prejudice against a woman because he does not force himself to have sexual feelings for her? No. He would be respected for loving other men and encouraged by liberals to feed his fetish (all right, I'll be inclusive) to satisfy his sexual hunger the way he sees fit. Having a positive racial bias does not hurt anyone. The exclusion of women in that man's life is not seen as misogynistic or unfair to women, but simply a preference. If women were oppressed by men in American society (like, actually oppressed) would they then think that male homosexuality would be a sexual prejudice toward women? I have heard people say that if they find black women ugly they are racist. I know that in the middle east, men have very strong fraternal bonds between themselves, but if they let that bond turn to lust, then they are in sin and must be killed.

I do think that if one gender has more power, they have more kinship.

The Paradoxes of the Christian NRx

As a Christian in the Alt-Right, I've been facing a few personal moral issues. The first is my wrath. I refuse to be saddened about the issues that have happened, sadness brings me nowhere right now. I've wallowed in depression long enough, but I find myself replacing this sadness with anger. This anger breeds resentment, self-hatred, contempt and pride. I find myself having to realign myself, often with the psalm (36:10): "Be still, and know that I am the Lord." I find myself rebelling against God's authority, questioning its legitimacy and finding myself ill and disgusted, which makes me think I've gone too far in my ideologies.

NRx Misogyny Apology

I did some reconnaissance recently, and delved into some pretty good arguments against the Alt-Right. Apart from the anti-large-CEO image the technocrats give off, there was the obvious reoccuring theme of 'racism' but also 'sexism'. I was a bit puzzled, but then it became clear to me. Yes, the author of this article was a feminist (I'm reviewing the article now, it'll be up soon) a male feminist, to be precise, or perhaps he was just fond of loose girls he can easily have sex with. The guy seemed like he had done a bit of research, but focused far too much on the biography of certain big names, and it ended up being more tedious than interesting. Not much is interesting these days apart from the reactosphere, honestly. But back to the point... sexism.

Cross-Factoring Common Political Enemies

So recently I've been increasingly involved politically. I used to be a liberal, centrist, basically I had few opinions on things and I thought morality was relative. Then, I became an SJW and explored the extreme-left. I then re-centered, went to the right and then went to the extreme right. It is in my temperament to like extremes, that's a fact I cannot ignore or repress, but I am not ashamed. I just want the truth and the truth that lies in those extremes are interesting. On my way across the political spectrum, I realized that there are many groups who have common enemies. I will list my discoveries:

Common enemy: Jews
Groups: Neo-Nazis and Truthers
Truthers are hardcore conspiracy theories. I personally think they're right about a lot of it. Jews do own the main top banks and it seems like the Bible was right about the Jews being the people of the Lord, however, there is a conpiracy concerning this elite group that involves Satanic rituals. I honestly do not understand the logistics of of this, so I'll be humble and just leave it at that. Neo-Nazis, well, they dislike Jews... well... for being Jews, apart from there many criteria I shan't get into. The Jews, man, they've always been hated. Check out the pic of them being burned in 1348. Hitler's not even original. (By Luzerner Schilling)

Mandatory Diversity Class is Reeducation

So you might have heard of this. "Diversity classes" yes. It's pretty clear to those on the Alt-Right that this is a form of reeducation. People can't have had a good education from just living because they are one race and need to experience the turmoil that other races face in the same society. So, they need to have a mandatory class on diversity so that they can know exactly how they are oppressing minorities. Well, this will definitely end badly. 

1. Clearly this is targetting whites. This is claiming that the white identity is intrinsically lacking because of the lack of 'racial tensions' that we avoid for being white. It's saying that white people are privileged and therefore, they need oppression points that they will get by becoming activists, in set movements such as BLM. They're creating puzzle pieces for their global agenda and slotting them in right where they want them. The racism in this is astounding, but they've built a frame narrative of the prejudice+power = sexism/racism in order to fit that narrative. We are going toward a communist state and it's funny that it's the left that's scared of Trump's authoritarianism.

2. It's reeducation that's been going on for a decade. When I was in high school, our classes (in Canada) were minority-focused. We had sec. 1 to focus on Jews and the holocaust, we had sec. 3 to focus on blacks and the chattel slavery in America. Honestly, it was really boring and really gross. I kept on being grossed out and terrified by what happened that now when I read about it I just end up being grossed out and terrified. But mainly, I remember 14-year-old me thinking 'Why aren't we reading Shakespeare? Why do we have to talk about street gangs? A couple of whites in my classes even glorified gang culture and wasn't even called out for it. It was normal for him to say positive things about gang culture, despite the initiation stories, the rape and violence, the mentality, etc of said gangs. No, they were black--it was almost like we had to appreciate their culture despite its clear degeneration. "But that's not REAL black culture." Ok. Sure. I'll give you that, so then why were we (an all-white class) forced to eat up American slavery and black gang culture? (albeit in there was The Outsiders, which was a white thing, but still shitty, despite perhaps a bit tragic as well) It's because it's programming. It's this unnatural insertion into a perfectly good culture of guilt and racism and things that don't belong because we have mixed races and a broken social cohesion. Canada's great, but people ignore that Canada's great because people don't care about anything. We're also very few compared to the US. 35 million, which is almost the pop. size of California. There are 300 million in the US and growing exponentially due to illegals from Mexico. So, a small country with lots of land, and few pockets of Muslims, Blacks and others won't be very violent. It's not an excuse to continue to break its social cohesion by adding in multicultural studies that don't really help students grow--it just helps them feel sorry for black people, victimize them.

3. America is a melting pot anyway, or a mosaic at some places. Who cares about diversity when there is diversity around you? Clearly in the ultra-left, individualism and agency goes down the pipe. Women and minorities are victims and need coddling and need the majority and whites and men to bow down to them and let them take the lead for a while. Right. Well, ask any woman over 60 if they liked working alongside women, and they'll have the guts to tell you, no, women are catty and they emotionally manipulate you to feel horrible about yourself. 50 and under, they had second-wave feminism up in their ears. Women studies are useless. No one cares about what people with vaginas could do, it's about what PEOPLE can do. People who vote for a woman because she's a woman... please... baby Jesus... why?? Gender studies? Male and female. Be one or hate one, next. Multicultural/diversity... why? Some people are racist, others aren't. Sorry that you fuck up our social cohesion. (God, imagine that, if whites oppressed blacks with the argument of social cohesion how messed up that would be? It's totally the same thing right now, but we're white and we scoff it off because we're Vikings. I just imagined a huge manly Viking man picking up a cow with one arm and drinking from its teat as a little minority came running at him with a sign saying 'Diversity Now' and he just slaps him away laughing, his voice basically thunder.) Indigenous? But... didn't the animals who live there live on the land and then you took it from them? Regressive argument. Nothing there. Why are we forced into empathy classes when we should be building new culture, progressing technologically, and becoming greater people? If whites are to be prolific, be happy for them, they're paving the way for future generations. Most white people are not racist toward non-whites, it's just... the other. Sorry. Bias is normal. Prejudice can be adjusted, but we can't stop progress for adjustment. It needs to go on.

I want to start the hashtags. #oopsedinagulag for the conservatives out there, because it's cute and you can say it after you say something 'offensive'. And #gulaglife2017 because it's fun and true. Hope to see you all in the neo-gulags!           

The Social Justice Conclusion

"There is a difference between men raising issues and raising men's issues." 

Logically, when it comes down to social justice, the ones who need it more are men. MRA's are where it's at. There are very few shelters for battered men, battered men are shamed by other men, men have a difficult time to express their emotions and it leads to a horrendous suicide count. After having been part of the left and having watched many videos on Identity Politics and now finding ground in Christian Conservatism and the Alt-Right, I have concluded that feminism is not only useless but very dangerous, egalitarianism is the norm, and those we call Men's Rights Activists are the only ones doing actual work. Feminism, such as Femaleism (that cares about having babies and being a wife to a man, or sublimating one's spirit into God) is needed, but I'll get to that in another post.

Sexual Liberation is Patriarchal

“Birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race.” --Margaret Sanger

Apart from the fact that sexual liberation is the activation of passions of the flesh, which is outright degenerate and undignified, it's also incredibly patriarchal. The West is not patriarchal because it is secular. There are men who govern laws, and the West has survived mainly because there were no abortions and people used to be religious. In a sense, there was a slight 'Patriarchy' because women need control in a civilization due to their nature to want to breed with the strongest player. At war, single women will jump onto the invader and breed, not on the men fighting for her.

Freethought and Leftist Buzzphrases Mindcontrol

Abracadabra: "I say what I create"  --Ancient Magic.

Now, don't get me wrong here, I don't personally become offended by something someone tells me, but when something does happen, it gives me insight to the effects this culture and world, especially the secular/mainstream world, is having on their minds. I've noticed that a lot of leftists use certain words in order to control your thoughts or to shut down your thought process. A lot of leftists cannot think outside of themselves. Self-interest is one of the main priorities of the majority of the mainstream leftist thought. They're selfish children who think nationality is 'silly' and that it should be okay to mock Religious people openly, on social media and in public. These are a few things they tend to say:

Women Power is Not In Feminism--It's in Conservatism

There is a minority of activist women in America who identify as Christian (seriously) and/or Conservative. They want to reclaim the word 'feminist'. Personally, on a side-note, I would like to coin the word Femalist, those who care about the female sex, about reproduction, female beauty, humility and sacrifice. These feminists call third-wave mainstream feminists 'fauxminists' as they devaluing the true nature of women. Now I'm not going to make an argument from nature, because that's an endless cycle of bullshit. I'm going to make the argument from God. Woman arose from the earth. Female. She who bears fruit in her womb.

Food for Thought

If America (Canado-American culture) is so corrupt... why do people want to immigrate here? We're a rape culture. We are patriarchal and non-equal. We are sexually repressed and way too traditional. Wow, it sounds like a great fucking place for Muslims, does it?

Moral Objectivism: Keeping Things Right and Wrong

When morality is flexible, people start to decide for themselves what is right and what is wrong. If there is no authority on morality (such as a higher authority, like God, for example) then people themselves can decide what is good and what is not good. Religions follow God(s) that give them the life lessons and morality they need in order to live a happy and fulfilled life. But when morality is dictated by humans, by their experiences and their feelings, things can become chaotic. The embodiment of evil, Satan you could call it, wants chaos. He wants people to decide for themselves what is good and what is evil. If a pedophile thinks it feels 'right' to have sex with a youth, and the youth seems to like it as well, is it immoral? The child could be pampered and trained and think that its reality is fine and dandy, but is it? Who is to tell? Are the negative psychological backlash of the child the reason behind dictating if the acts/relationship is moral or immoral? If you would arrest the man and take him away from his young lover, and the youth would protest and weep for the loss of her loved one, could you make an exception to a rule? The answer is simple: We do not have any objective marker in the human being that enables us to claim any authority on morality. Society and other people tend to want to change morality for convenience sake, for pleasures' sake, for love's sake. While love is beautiful and important, it is also horrible and breaking: love, while love can be infinitely good and bountiful, it does not serve as a moral marker.

White Genocide

"Demographics will dictate the values a society holds." --Black Pigeon Speaks 

Right now, we are facing mass terrorism in the middle-east, to the civilians of those countries by Islamist men. The women in Islam are oppressed, seriously; they have no say in the politics of Sharia and how radical Islam has become. That terror is rising to Europe. Germany and Sweden are main targets, the latter now devastated by a rise in rape/sexual assault by 100% from Muslim migrants (legal ones) onto young Swedish women. Their governments are silent. They do not use military action against the migrants, they do not make laws to protect them from acting out furthermore. They are insane by anarchic notions of freedom and cultural relativity. All of this is propagated by the fear of words, or Political Correctness, which is the main talking point on the agenda of Cultural Marxism. Political Correctness (see list here) is one of the foundational stones of Cultural Marxism. Not only is Political Correctness encouraged, it is enforced. Any word that people employ that does not conform to this new secular Religion is automatically corrected by the CM Gestapo, which are now called Social Justice Warriors or (SJW's) for short. Their title is a misnomer, these people are the intolerant, bigoted (and they love using that word against people) and incredibly self-righteous. They are also blind. Blind to other perspectives, blind to politics and economy. I've heard theories that they are the drones of the Illuminati, a group known for its feminism, secular humanism, and openness about sexuality. That's not even far-fetched for a conspiracy, it's a reality. 

Cultural Marxism and the Anti-Christian Movement

Cultural Marxism is a form of applied Marxism that is projected onto culture and society. It is broken down and all parts that are less valorized in society get labeled 'oppressed' while the parts that are valorized are labeled 'oppressor'. This is much like intersectional feminism, where different groups are targeted and then activated for/toward through the media, politics, and the general social atmosphere. However, certain people have thought that Cultural Marxism was a term used to demonize "feminists, homosexuals, secular humanists, multiculturalist, sex educators, environmentalist, immigrants, and black nationalists."

It is surprising to see how much of this agenda is anti-Christian, or, perhaps not surprising at all.
Let's break down the pieces: