College Professor Calls Whites 'Inhuman'

Johnny Eric Williamson, his profile easily attainable through Facebook, is a Neo-Marxist college professor who bathes in a righteous odoriferous melange of pheromones that attract those who have chosen to fester in the academic blight in the West. While yapping away aimlessly concerning 'systems' in which whites have earned and therefore claimed ownership and superiority, he went ahead and posted this:

And then went on to attempt to come back on his word, despite it being far too late already:

Simply pathetic.

It's not everyday that an academic, who is part of a credentialed elite club they call 'Guilds' goes to social media and says 'Let Them Fucking Die' about white people. All this code-word garbage is propaganda, tools of manipulation this person is using in an ideologically-possessed fervour in order to push an agenda that continues to the long-lasting process that is the destruction of white culture and inevitably, the white race in general. This is a man, mind you, a white man, who is so full of hatred toward himself and his own people he puts internalized misogynist feminists to shame. This is virtue-signalling at best, narcissism on parade as empathy. But it's not enough to love blacks, browns, Muslims and immigrants (? lol) you have to just be so petty as to victimize them by claiming that everything around you is biased toward whites and therefore it's unfair. Of course, these professors would never DARE say that perhaps it would be best if all those people got out of the so-called absolutely oppressed country they're in, or perhaps demand part of it and ALL MOVE THERE and build their own institutions (and we could help them! such as blacks in America but once you're done, no more help and that's that) because deep down they know all those people are inferior.

The theory of intersectionality rests on one important axiom and it is one that Jews know very well: whites are superior. Jews are red-pilled on race and have been for quite some time, they know, they've traveled like crazy and they're smart! This axiom is something ALL SJW's know deep down, and it will come out as a Freudian slip (as it has in AIDS Skrillex, who almost says 'we already know that white lives matter' I'm serious, look up the famous clip!) and it comes out as absolute pity, sympathy, and even light racism toward blacks and others.

Academia is a huge psy-op at the moment. It is not truthful, it is not seeking to build bridges. It is 100% Luciferian, ideological, and absolutely Marxist in nature. It is a dangerous place to be in University these days, I do not recommend it unless you're planning on going into Science. As for Johnny Eric Williamson, I hope Trinity College fires him for saying such anti-white, racist and ridiculous things.

Feminists: Red Pill or Sterilize

As much as I wish feminists would realize that the way they see the world is not so far off to how we see the world and then break free from their anger, I would also like to see them not have any children. There is some similarities between sex-negative feminism and the Alt-Right. The only difference is patriarchy. Anyone on the right is willing to accept the patriarchy, and has made peace with it. Western Women, however strong the patriarchy, have the freedom to have a job, to choose her mate, to go on birth control, and to have a general safe environment to live in. For feminists, this isn't enough. Let's not get into sex-positive feminism because it's just degenerate and rather distasteful to speak about at this point. Sex-negative feminists are angry at a system they believe in white male-run, when we are both targeting the same Jewish system. It's not white males that own most corporations, that desire to cause degeneracy in the world, that teach women it's all right to be a sex object, that it's powerful to be sexually promiscuous, to be a prostitute, etc It's the Jews. I do think that intersectionality was funded and executed by Jews, in order to target white men, the founders of the West, in order to seed this social anarchy that we see so prominently today.

But I digress.

Feminists, and I used to be one, so I know this quite well, think that men are all raised to hate women, to think women are inferior, and grow up watching porn, their parents apathetic to this, and then are taught that all women want to be fucked by men really badly so much that they don't need consent and can all just rape women and it's all right.
Well, there's a bit right there. Pornography, which is total and utter degeneracy, ruins young growing men's minds, destroys their chances at a healthy sexuality, and poisons their view of women. We agree here. We also agree that rape is degenerate, savage and scavenger behaviour, and we need to abolish it. So we agree.

But feminists want to reform men. They want men to stop objectifying women, which we know is impossible. They don't want to be in a patriarchy because they have a deep distrust of the patriarchy simply because they believe it values men and not women, or men more and women less. This is where we differ. Women on the right are highly valued, and have high expectations, expectations that now are lower because of the amount of fell women in our midst. To me, a woman who is family-oriented, who does not perform social activism, who does not have a degree in Gender Studies, who does not victimize herself and seeks a strong, dominant and ambitious man as her mate meets the expectations (later will become a mother of children and be a housewife is preferable). Is this so difficult to be in this day and age? It seems to easy to become pregnant these days. It seems like people are constantly attempting to love women and love femininity and yet, no one cares about being a good wife, a supporting female partner to a career-oriented man, a mother, an educator, a resources manager, a cook and all the wonderful 50's things that women were cherished for being.

Gender Roles. Why?

Women and men are different. We are beautiful the way we are. Tradition is important, and it is so for everyone. There are different roles men and women can have in a society. Not all women should be mothers and not all men should be fathers. Some people are born different and they might want to live another kind of lifestyle, hopefully one that is healthy and not sinful. Women who do not feel the inclination to have children might want to become full-time nurses or full-time educators and do charity work or helping sisters or female friends raise their children. They can also pursue scientific or academic careers as well, but I believe they might be lacking in their need for personal love and affection. Often these women will attempt to fill the gaping hole in their lives with dogs and cats, and although that is nice, it's not nearly as satisfying as having a child of their own. If they cannot make children, perhaps they could think of adoption.

Let's talk gender roles