I wrote a piece on LGBT marriage where I still had the view that homosexuality was wrong and sinful, but that in the end, people can still be 'joined' non-religiously without being persecuted if they act like normal heterosexual couples. It was a point of 'character' instead of a reduction of their genitals, but my views have changed. They have because I have understood more deeply the influence of patriarchal authority, its importance and why homosexuality is a symptom of a diseased society and is actually far more self-destructive than healthy.
1. Homosexuals are stunted children, who, much like pedophiles, have immature brains and a fetish that needs to be healed but is being treated as normal.
2. The treatment of sexual deviancy as normalcy is a patriarchal failure due to women's empowerment. LGBT is often more accepted with women because of human 'empathic' reactions.
3. Homosexuals are often child molesters due to seeing sexual deviancy as normal. Pedophilia is the next step and often pedophiles use gay-rights and gay-marches to feel liberated and attempt to drag children in the parades in order to feel like they are making progress. Therefore, the empowerment of LGBT is by proxy empowering pedophiles. The normalization of pedophilia will destroy our society's health.
4. More heterosexual people think being 'bi' is cool and often open their marriage to let in a unicorn. I've been seeing this more and more now and it's because of the LGBT empowerment. It's wrong and must be stigmatized as freakish, immoral and destructive.
5. Homosexuals hate children, they are openly childphobic, pro-abortion, and want to live in an 'adult' world. They don't care about children and should not be around them.
I don't think two sexual deviants should get together and be considered married. I don't want them to be able to adopt children that they cannot produce themselves naturally (without artificial insemination) and I don't want them to be considered 'normal' in society.
I'm sorry in the past if I was still very liberal about the way that I thought. The more I see the way our beautiful white societies are going, the more I have intense resentment for the people destroying it. Gays do not need pity, they need mental help. If they can cure pedophilia (which they can!) they can cure homosexuality. And even there, if gays want to have mass sex in orgiastic clubs together and remain children, perhaps we should see them as such and let them have their 'fun' without accepting them in society. They will be what they have been in white societies for quite some time now: gypsies and vagabonds, whores and sluts, and good moral people should stay far far away from them. We should not agree with our children becoming gay, we should never encourage being 'trans', we should be responsible adults. We should also not commit violence toward these people, but we do need to instill healthy stigmas, like treating them as having mental illness instead of them being validated as normal. Homosexuality is not normal, it's a fast-growing fetish and its normalization is bringing out child neglect, marriage-neglect and is creating a huge idol of lust.
Showing posts with label lesbian. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lesbian. Show all posts
Thursday, 30 March 2017
Monday, 21 November 2016
CNN Reporter Sally Kohn's Lesbianic Pedophilia
In this absolutely vile and disgusting article, Sally Kohn projects her sexual feelings toward another woman onto her daughter (not sure if adopted or biological). She lives in an uppity neighbourhood surrounded by rich white people and probably suffers 0% intolerance from her neighbours because what's lesbianism when you're rolling in a pool of greed and sin already?
She desires her daughter to be a lesbian. This is the most disgusting thing I've ever read, and yet, it echoes feelings I used to have when I was an insane SJW who fetishized homosexuality. It's clear that she does--she's an SJW (and Jewish). A few years ago, I wished to have children in the future and I wished them to be gay, simply because I thought it was 'cooler' and more 'rebellious' to be gay, also easier since no pregnancies would arise.
But apart from the dewy-eyed otaku-like feelings one has for gays in their teenhood and early adulthood, when a mature adult wishes their own child to be sexually attracted to not only the same-sex but in the same sexual structure as they are, that's projection and it has sinister pedophilic undertones. Why does Kohn even obsess over her 6-YEAR-OLD's sexuality like this? I'm thinking she's probably fantasized about her sexually. Homosexuals these days accept all of their sexual feelings for whatever, they embrace them and they even humanize and valorize pedophiles, so it's clear that for her to be able to be a lesbian and have this identitarian ideology of acceptance, she has to accept that she wants her daughter to be a lesbian BECAUSE she has sexual feelings for her. It's this weird double-think where she cannot deny and suppress her sexual lesbian feelings for her young daughter because it would be 'bad' emotionally, and therefore 'accepts' it, but refuses to lose face and admit that she's a pedophile, so twists it around and makes it all about the 6-year old. Ugh.
Lesbians have projected onto me in the past. I've spoken about them in numerous other posts, but they attempted to make me into a sexual degenerate by claiming that because I had enjoyed making out with a girl in college that I was bisexual and that I should be allowed to have a polyamourous relationship with a woman in my already-built family life. I never wanted to be a lesbian, even when I fetishized the concept--being with a woman was always 'weird' in the end to me, and I never cared about social pressure, so I know it came all of from me. Well, I cared about social pressure when I became a conservative, because I understood its use.
People born in wealth are born in vice. Many SJW's are high middle class people who value personal, individual growth but not in a healthy way, in a hedonistic, debauched kind of way that is far from God, or a secular version of potential actualization. Sally Kohn is born in the nepotistic-dynasty of 'God's chosen people' and has Original Sin flowing in her veins. She proudly asserts her degeneracy, refuses to humble herself in front of the Lord and nature itself and posts this God-awful article in the Washington Post.
This is a really 'homophobic' post compared to this last one I wrote, which was much more moderate and 'rational', but there is just something tragic about the children of lesbians or gays. It's not family, it's not right, it's not sacred, it's a perversion and an abomination and it breaks my heart.
She desires her daughter to be a lesbian. This is the most disgusting thing I've ever read, and yet, it echoes feelings I used to have when I was an insane SJW who fetishized homosexuality. It's clear that she does--she's an SJW (and Jewish). A few years ago, I wished to have children in the future and I wished them to be gay, simply because I thought it was 'cooler' and more 'rebellious' to be gay, also easier since no pregnancies would arise.
But apart from the dewy-eyed otaku-like feelings one has for gays in their teenhood and early adulthood, when a mature adult wishes their own child to be sexually attracted to not only the same-sex but in the same sexual structure as they are, that's projection and it has sinister pedophilic undertones. Why does Kohn even obsess over her 6-YEAR-OLD's sexuality like this? I'm thinking she's probably fantasized about her sexually. Homosexuals these days accept all of their sexual feelings for whatever, they embrace them and they even humanize and valorize pedophiles, so it's clear that for her to be able to be a lesbian and have this identitarian ideology of acceptance, she has to accept that she wants her daughter to be a lesbian BECAUSE she has sexual feelings for her. It's this weird double-think where she cannot deny and suppress her sexual lesbian feelings for her young daughter because it would be 'bad' emotionally, and therefore 'accepts' it, but refuses to lose face and admit that she's a pedophile, so twists it around and makes it all about the 6-year old. Ugh.
Lesbians have projected onto me in the past. I've spoken about them in numerous other posts, but they attempted to make me into a sexual degenerate by claiming that because I had enjoyed making out with a girl in college that I was bisexual and that I should be allowed to have a polyamourous relationship with a woman in my already-built family life. I never wanted to be a lesbian, even when I fetishized the concept--being with a woman was always 'weird' in the end to me, and I never cared about social pressure, so I know it came all of from me. Well, I cared about social pressure when I became a conservative, because I understood its use.
People born in wealth are born in vice. Many SJW's are high middle class people who value personal, individual growth but not in a healthy way, in a hedonistic, debauched kind of way that is far from God, or a secular version of potential actualization. Sally Kohn is born in the nepotistic-dynasty of 'God's chosen people' and has Original Sin flowing in her veins. She proudly asserts her degeneracy, refuses to humble herself in front of the Lord and nature itself and posts this God-awful article in the Washington Post.
This is a really 'homophobic' post compared to this last one I wrote, which was much more moderate and 'rational', but there is just something tragic about the children of lesbians or gays. It's not family, it's not right, it's not sacred, it's a perversion and an abomination and it breaks my heart.
Sunday, 4 September 2016
Trudeau and Iceland
http://conservativefans.com/2016/07/26/trudeau-says-hes-moving-to-iceland-if-trump-wins/
"Iceland is the most peaceful country in the world" says Trudeau who then added that it was an ideal place for one to raise his children.
So, it's satire, but a lot of people took it very seriously. Was it created in order to stir discussion about white identity and white supremacy? If it did, well, let's stir the stew and throw some posts why don't we?
96% of the population of Iceland is pure, milk-drinker white. You wonder why there is so much peace? Is it the secular government? The egalitarian society (with authoritarian males, of course)? The hygge? The Norse blood? The fair and just legal system?
Iceland isn't perfect, what with allowing a lesbian to be their Prime Minister and gay marriage, but let's be honestly, it is a paradise compared to Canada and the US. And you might think gay marriage is fine, Iceland is after all, founded on a Christian basis that has been secularized. It is probably better to let homosexuals be happy than have them constantly in rebellion, pushing back against normalcy. I do think that when homosexuality is more tolerated it has less a chance to be fetishized, but I remain against gay marriage. I mean, why? These days, although it still bothers me, I've come to accept romantic relationships between same-sex partners, intimate relationships. Daniel Tammet has a male partner that he has claimed is more like a soft lover (although they are married) than someone to satisfy his lust on. We can argue about Greek ideals of beauty and male love another day, but I think that homosexuality should be about soft love if ever homosociality is just not enough.
"Iceland is the most peaceful country in the world" says Trudeau who then added that it was an ideal place for one to raise his children.
So, it's satire, but a lot of people took it very seriously. Was it created in order to stir discussion about white identity and white supremacy? If it did, well, let's stir the stew and throw some posts why don't we?
96% of the population of Iceland is pure, milk-drinker white. You wonder why there is so much peace? Is it the secular government? The egalitarian society (with authoritarian males, of course)? The hygge? The Norse blood? The fair and just legal system?
Iceland isn't perfect, what with allowing a lesbian to be their Prime Minister and gay marriage, but let's be honestly, it is a paradise compared to Canada and the US. And you might think gay marriage is fine, Iceland is after all, founded on a Christian basis that has been secularized. It is probably better to let homosexuals be happy than have them constantly in rebellion, pushing back against normalcy. I do think that when homosexuality is more tolerated it has less a chance to be fetishized, but I remain against gay marriage. I mean, why? These days, although it still bothers me, I've come to accept romantic relationships between same-sex partners, intimate relationships. Daniel Tammet has a male partner that he has claimed is more like a soft lover (although they are married) than someone to satisfy his lust on. We can argue about Greek ideals of beauty and male love another day, but I think that homosexuality should be about soft love if ever homosociality is just not enough.
Sunday, 17 July 2016
Sexual Liberation is Patriarchal
“Birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race.” --Margaret Sanger
Apart from the fact that sexual liberation is the activation of passions of the flesh, which is outright degenerate and undignified, it's also incredibly patriarchal. The West is not patriarchal because it is secular. There are men who govern laws, and the West has survived mainly because there were no abortions and people used to be religious. In a sense, there was a slight 'Patriarchy' because women need control in a civilization due to their nature to want to breed with the strongest player. At war, single women will jump onto the invader and breed, not on the men fighting for her.
Apart from the fact that sexual liberation is the activation of passions of the flesh, which is outright degenerate and undignified, it's also incredibly patriarchal. The West is not patriarchal because it is secular. There are men who govern laws, and the West has survived mainly because there were no abortions and people used to be religious. In a sense, there was a slight 'Patriarchy' because women need control in a civilization due to their nature to want to breed with the strongest player. At war, single women will jump onto the invader and breed, not on the men fighting for her.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)