The Maple League for Advocacy, Globalist Conferences at Canadian Universities

So this be happening soon:

Members of the Maple League – Acadia, Bishop’s, Mount Allison, and St. Francis Xavier – believe that higher education should provide a balanced and comprehensive experience that challenges our young people and prepares them for responsible, ethical, and sustainable leadership.
We also believe that institutions of higher learning have a responsibility to support students as they become global citizens. The Maple League schools are united in a shared vision that promotes social justice and human rights for all members of the community. We will spend the weekend exploring ways we can enhance these opportunities at our own universities and share these experiences with members of the Maple League.
The weekend promises to be stimulating, thought provoking, and delightful. In addition to plenary speakers, a student debate tournament, a Business School CASE Competition, and a series of receptions, we are hosting TEDxBishopsU, a multidisciplinary event that will feature speakers drawn from the talented pool of students, faculty, alumni, community members, and staff from the four universities. Each talk will focus on ADVOCACY in higher education – either inside or outside the classroom. What constitutes an advocate? How do we create support for members of our community to become effective advocates? How can we create conditions to foster social justice, advocate for human rights, or facilitate a sense of global citizenship?
Advocacy can take many forms. You can be an advocate for a principle or set of beliefs, for a cause or group, for an ideal or philosophy. It can also include being an ally or a champion. Advocacy can include (but is not limited to) championing human rights, the pursuit of social justice, providing support or resources for the voiceless or marginalized, etc. We will spend the weekend exploring:
1.     What are the qualities/characteristics that make someone an advocate?
2.     What role do universities play in helping install advocacy in its students and faculty and staff?
3.     How can we enhance advocacy in our communities?

Mandatory Diversity Class is Reeducation

So you might have heard of this. "Diversity classes" yes. It's pretty clear to those on the Alt-Right that this is a form of reeducation. People can't have had a good education from just living because they are one race and need to experience the turmoil that other races face in the same society. So, they need to have a mandatory class on diversity so that they can know exactly how they are oppressing minorities. Well, this will definitely end badly. 

1. Clearly this is targetting whites. This is claiming that the white identity is intrinsically lacking because of the lack of 'racial tensions' that we avoid for being white. It's saying that white people are privileged and therefore, they need oppression points that they will get by becoming activists, in set movements such as BLM. They're creating puzzle pieces for their global agenda and slotting them in right where they want them. The racism in this is astounding, but they've built a frame narrative of the prejudice+power = sexism/racism in order to fit that narrative. We are going toward a communist state and it's funny that it's the left that's scared of Trump's authoritarianism.

2. It's reeducation that's been going on for a decade. When I was in high school, our classes (in Canada) were minority-focused. We had sec. 1 to focus on Jews and the holocaust, we had sec. 3 to focus on blacks and the chattel slavery in America. Honestly, it was really boring and really gross. I kept on being grossed out and terrified by what happened that now when I read about it I just end up being grossed out and terrified. But mainly, I remember 14-year-old me thinking 'Why aren't we reading Shakespeare? Why do we have to talk about street gangs? A couple of whites in my classes even glorified gang culture and wasn't even called out for it. It was normal for him to say positive things about gang culture, despite the initiation stories, the rape and violence, the mentality, etc of said gangs. No, they were black--it was almost like we had to appreciate their culture despite its clear degeneration. "But that's not REAL black culture." Ok. Sure. I'll give you that, so then why were we (an all-white class) forced to eat up American slavery and black gang culture? (albeit in there was The Outsiders, which was a white thing, but still shitty, despite perhaps a bit tragic as well) It's because it's programming. It's this unnatural insertion into a perfectly good culture of guilt and racism and things that don't belong because we have mixed races and a broken social cohesion. Canada's great, but people ignore that Canada's great because people don't care about anything. We're also very few compared to the US. 35 million, which is almost the pop. size of California. There are 300 million in the US and growing exponentially due to illegals from Mexico. So, a small country with lots of land, and few pockets of Muslims, Blacks and others won't be very violent. It's not an excuse to continue to break its social cohesion by adding in multicultural studies that don't really help students grow--it just helps them feel sorry for black people, victimize them.

3. America is a melting pot anyway, or a mosaic at some places. Who cares about diversity when there is diversity around you? Clearly in the ultra-left, individualism and agency goes down the pipe. Women and minorities are victims and need coddling and need the majority and whites and men to bow down to them and let them take the lead for a while. Right. Well, ask any woman over 60 if they liked working alongside women, and they'll have the guts to tell you, no, women are catty and they emotionally manipulate you to feel horrible about yourself. 50 and under, they had second-wave feminism up in their ears. Women studies are useless. No one cares about what people with vaginas could do, it's about what PEOPLE can do. People who vote for a woman because she's a woman... please... baby Jesus... why?? Gender studies? Male and female. Be one or hate one, next. Multicultural/diversity... why? Some people are racist, others aren't. Sorry that you fuck up our social cohesion. (God, imagine that, if whites oppressed blacks with the argument of social cohesion how messed up that would be? It's totally the same thing right now, but we're white and we scoff it off because we're Vikings. I just imagined a huge manly Viking man picking up a cow with one arm and drinking from its teat as a little minority came running at him with a sign saying 'Diversity Now' and he just slaps him away laughing, his voice basically thunder.) Indigenous? But... didn't the animals who live there live on the land and then you took it from them? Regressive argument. Nothing there. Why are we forced into empathy classes when we should be building new culture, progressing technologically, and becoming greater people? If whites are to be prolific, be happy for them, they're paving the way for future generations. Most white people are not racist toward non-whites, it's just... the other. Sorry. Bias is normal. Prejudice can be adjusted, but we can't stop progress for adjustment. It needs to go on.

I want to start the hashtags. #oopsedinagulag for the conservatives out there, because it's cute and you can say it after you say something 'offensive'. And #gulaglife2017 because it's fun and true. Hope to see you all in the neo-gulags!           

Indigenous People and 'Their' Land

This is going to be quick. I believe in evolution. This makes us great apes, hominids. Other apes and mammals are far family, we are all life and we all have DNA. I respect creationists and creation theories as well, but my argument will work with the former theory. When people speak of 'native' land it is the land in which you are born. Yes, anchor babies are native to where they were born. So, when someone says: my land, it usually means the place they were born. That place, if they are proud of it for numerous reasons, say it is a nice place, a democratic place of equality and opportunity, is their nation. The earth you stand on belongs to not only other people than you and your family but other animals as well. Animals that we are breeding, killing, farming and exterminating due to our excessive and luxurious civilizations. I want to make clear that 'indigenous' people, just because they had rituals and dances and fires in one part of the Earth, do not have a hold on the land on which other people are born. Europe expanded. They had a more formative culture--they had more tech, they took over because they could. It's only natural. As soon as they had babies, those babies were native to that land. Yes, the land was taken by force, yes there were terrible wars and tragic diseases that infected the indigenous peoples, but like anchor babies, Europeans came in and embraced their Destiny and made the land their own.

There is no substance in the 'indigenous people own the land' argument. 
 Actually, there were animals there before you. I know you lived alongside them and shared, but you're an animal too, and you profited of the land. Other hominids moved to where you were and profited of the land. Were they excessive and violent, dirty and sinful? Yes! I think it is unfortunate that there was a clash of cultures, but when it comes to 'I own this land because I was here first' argument, there were other animals that lived there before you and before them and before them. Just because you can think and rationalize doesn't make that land more yours than anyone else who was born there can claim.

We all share the West. Blacks, whites, yellows, reds. The West is for everyone. We all share the land. The land is not sacred to one tribe, but to all of us. We are harming it and it is wrong. We should respect life, respect animals, respect the land, and that's a value that has been lost due to our greed which blinds us. I would like to stress, however, that multiculturalism does not function organically, and that's for another post. Some cultures are stronger than others, some cultures are more corrupt than others, some cultures are weaker, uninteresting, lost and dead. Diversity is not strength. Strength is in unity. Unity is in kinship. Kinship is in trust. Trust is in love.

Cultural Marxism and the Anti-Christian Movement

Cultural Marxism is a form of applied Marxism that is projected onto culture and society. It is broken down and all parts that are less valorized in society get labeled 'oppressed' while the parts that are valorized are labeled 'oppressor'. This is much like intersectional feminism, where different groups are targeted and then activated for/toward through the media, politics, and the general social atmosphere. However, certain people have thought that Cultural Marxism was a term used to demonize "feminists, homosexuals, secular humanists, multiculturalist, sex educators, environmentalist, immigrants, and black nationalists."

It is surprising to see how much of this agenda is anti-Christian, or, perhaps not surprising at all.
Let's break down the pieces: