Changed Views on LGBT Marriage

I wrote a piece on LGBT marriage where I still had the view that homosexuality was wrong and sinful, but that in the end, people can still be 'joined' non-religiously without being persecuted if they act like normal heterosexual couples. It was a point of 'character' instead of a reduction of their genitals, but my views have changed. They have because I have understood more deeply the influence of patriarchal authority, its importance and why homosexuality is a symptom of a diseased society and is actually far more self-destructive than healthy.

1. Homosexuals are stunted children, who, much like pedophiles, have immature brains and a fetish that needs to be healed but is being treated as normal.

2. The treatment of sexual deviancy as normalcy is a patriarchal failure due to women's empowerment. LGBT is often more accepted with women because of human 'empathic' reactions.

3. Homosexuals are often child molesters due to seeing sexual deviancy as normal. Pedophilia is the next step and often pedophiles use gay-rights and gay-marches to feel liberated and attempt to drag children in the parades in order to feel like they are making progress. Therefore, the empowerment of LGBT is by proxy empowering pedophiles. The normalization of pedophilia will destroy our society's health.

4. More heterosexual people think being 'bi' is cool and often open their marriage to let in a unicorn. I've been seeing this more and more now and it's because of the LGBT empowerment. It's wrong and must be stigmatized as freakish, immoral and destructive.

5. Homosexuals hate children, they are openly childphobic, pro-abortion, and want to live in an 'adult' world. They don't care about children and should not be around them.

I don't think two sexual deviants should get together and be considered married. I don't want them to be able to adopt children that they cannot produce themselves naturally (without artificial insemination) and I don't want them to be considered 'normal' in society.

I'm sorry in the past if I was still very liberal about the way that I thought. The more I see the way our beautiful white societies are going, the more I have intense resentment for the people destroying it. Gays do not need pity, they need mental help. If they can cure pedophilia (which they can!) they can cure homosexuality. And even there, if gays want to have mass sex in orgiastic clubs together and remain children, perhaps we should see them as such and let them have their 'fun' without accepting them in society. They will be what they have been in white societies for quite some time now: gypsies and vagabonds, whores and sluts, and good moral people should stay far far away from them. We should not agree with our children becoming gay, we should never encourage being 'trans', we should be responsible adults. We should also not commit violence toward these people, but we do need to instill healthy stigmas, like treating them as having mental illness instead of them being validated as normal. Homosexuality is not normal, it's a fast-growing fetish and its normalization is bringing out child neglect, marriage-neglect and is creating a huge idol of lust.

LGBT Marriage

 I've updated this post recently. My views have changed and I no longer agree with much of what I've said here but I will not delete it because I think this is good rationalization. Still, for society as a whole and my own integrity, I cannot allow homosexuality to be validated and even less homosexual marriage. You can see the update here.

I'm not sure what to think about gay marriage. I'm not sure what to think of homosexual relationships in general. Like I'm said numerous times before, I think being sexually deviant is a form of lust. I don't think we should see people as 'gay' or 'straight', I think there is reproductive sexuality (man and woman) and then there are masturbatory practices that can happen between two people. I think gays and lesbians who want to marry are sexually active with each other and believe themselves spiritually bonded and therefore desire 'marriage'. What homosexuals don't seem to understand about marriage is that it's a religious act, it's an the bonding between two people to share the entirety of life together, and ultimately, to start a family. Is having a family necessary? Not really. You could focus on having a career, I guess. Gay men have a leg up in being non-family-oriented and career-focused, but still, what would you do with all the money you would accumulate? Move up the tiers of society? Buy a house for yourself? I guess you could adopt children and have a dog and live the life of a nuclear family. Same with lesbians. I just don't see how fulfilling it is to be with someone of your own sex.

You do your school, you have lots of lesbian/gay sex, sexual activity until your libido goes away, and then you move in together, get married, and then just live a career life and use your money for your own life. You travel, you set up a business selling something stupid, maybe if you're financially smart, you'll invest some money, but... where will that money go? I guess it could go to your adopted children, who'll have the privilege of having two moms or two dads, as if that's normal. Let's spread out the options for a married gay couple:

1. You live a 'normal' life, but you're gay. You adopt kids. You work your jobs. You live in a suburban neighbourhood.

2. You live a 'lonely' life, with no children, and a self-centered mutual partnership where your souls are bonded into the everlasting individual chaos that you believe in. If you are knowledge-oriented, you could take the time to be workaholic scientists or something useful.

3. You open up your marriage, you explore lust on a continuum, you focus all of your energy on your sexuality, on social justice activism, on forcing Christians to make cakes for you and attempt to open up Christianity to homosexuality.

Inbred Muslims

Reading up on cousin marriage I came upon the muslim tradition of cousin marriages. Cousins should not marry and breed. Why? Scientifically, inbreeding is terrible for genetic diversity. It blooms recessive alleles that, if paired with another who has been fecunded through incest, might carry. Together they can transmit to their child an autosomal recessive disease, which are numerous. I've found a list, and I chuckle that it comes from a Texan website.

Knowing that Muslims are traditional, they're will continue these gross illogical traditions no matter where they are in the world. It's abuse to your own soul to marry into your family. I used to be an SJW and I used to think even if a brother and sister were in love, it didn't matter as long as they don't have kids, but are you really going to let your brother fuck you without protection? How is that not total fetish? Now I know it's morally wrong to waste yourself to lust and to spoil your soul as such. Nonetheless, I know white people have their own history of incest, and I'm not proud of it, but at least we don't have a tradition in Christianity that promotes it. The cousin tradition in Islam is a majority 'elite' thing, which echoes our Royalty (although we didn't know about how bad inbreeding would make our child) Now we know and I think we tend to avoid marrying first-cousins in Royalty. I mean, recently the Dukes and Princes have been marrying lay-women!

Then there are articles that minimize inbreeding. Not as bad as you think??? Disgusting!
I mean, I'm not Aryan or anything, but at least my parents aren't at all related and I think if we want to have a society that makes any sort of sense we should NOT be breeding with (anyone outside our race, really) but especially not anyone that comes from a tradition of inbreeding!

I'm pretty disgusted concerning this map, even! It's legal to marry your first cousin almost everywhere in the world. Puke. I don't know, if I had to choose in between marrying a man in my country who wasn't my race or moving away to another nation, Jesus I would marry any normal-looking, healthy white man. You're normal, you're kind, you're hard-working and healthy? Now. Babies. Go. Never a cousin. Never a relative. Never a... non-milk-drinker.

We cannot let America or Canada accept anymore Muslims. We cannot let our beautiful Western Civ. fall to the mercy of Islamic domination. We cannot cease to marginalize with the best of our efforts those who stand in our way, despite the consequences it might have. This is not about us, it is about our children and their future for a safer world. 

Sigh... to end off, I'd like to present to you Charles II of Spain, massively inbred, physically and mentally disabled. This painting of him is probably what he wishes he looks like in his wildest dreams.