This one is for the normies out there who have never heard of the co-opting of white culture by the Jews. I'm not going to explain everything but this person is a Jew, and she is pretending to be European (or white) in order to push an agenda of ethnomasochism and cultural suicide. This merri little busch was indeed accidentally born in a country she does not belong in. Her ancestors have parasited Europe for hundreds of years and have not worked a day in their lives to help sustain those countries. Her ancestors come from a line of viruses who manipulated money and impoverished people for their own gain. They have some good points too, but this isn't one of them.
Merri believes she lives in a country where everyone's needs are met and everyone is happy and healthy. She's absolutely wrong. The West, although it has human rights and white people (who are racially kind and tolerant compared to all other races) and mass excess, it is also the largest world polluter, it has intense social degeneracy, thousands of cults, a whole industry of 'celebrity' idolatry, mass obesity, mass promiscuity, the hatred of wholesomeness, family and children. We live in a world where child sacrifice is becoming normalized, where women whined constantly for entitlements and privilege they do not deserve and men are becoming rapist scavengers due to the lack of female availability and long-term relationships. Yes, white men are becoming rapists and it is inevitable.
With that in mind, I hope you'll reconsider the reasoning being National Socialism, a type regime that had been predicted by Nietzsche, alongside communism. Whites and Jews have been trying to spread their personal brand of knowledge to the rest of the world for a while now. Whites tried to colonize and help out other countries (post-colonialism makes them look terrible despite their great efforts and improvements of those countries) and Jews tried to change things from blending in, race-mixing and establishing their brotherhoods and covenants covertly. Whites are not what Jews are: cowards. Jews know that their doings are Satanic, that they desire the fall of a civilization and when it is chaotic enough, they will take control through communism, the enslavement of the majority for the minority, a complete opposite strategy than the National Socialists, which benefited the majority at the expense of the minority. It was a radical exclusion and it did end up in the death of many people, but they were not exterminated in camps: they simply ran out of food and starved. This happened because there were no provisions for their own citizens, why should they send provisions for the prisoners of war? Communism and the Second World War costs Russia millions on millions of lives because of starvation. They cannibalized themselves to survive one more day in Russia! Same thing happened in Germany/Austria/Poland. It was a war, and resources were running out.
Now, I personally believe that everyone should stop ruling the world. The future is nationalistic, and ethno-nationalistic, it must be for the survival of everyone. Jews must go home to their Israel (although even that isn't their real home!) and whites need to have their countries back from the Muslims (and the Jews ruling our media, etc). We need to return to a more basic way of life, to farming ourselves, working harder, traditional gender roles, and not going to the Dominican Republic for vacations! Such a sad thing to see white people in those resorts...
Showing posts with label communism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label communism. Show all posts
Monday, 3 April 2017
Our Culture Is Not Privileged, Our Race Is
Labels:
Christ,
collectivism,
communism,
culture,
forgiveness,
jews,
justice,
National Socialism,
race,
social construct,
white privilege,
whiteness
Wednesday, 7 September 2016
Total Marxist Course List for Intro to Political Theory
So I love politics, and I wished to take a political theory course so I signed up for one. I checked out my course list excitedly to see the required materials to read. I was shocked.
These are the required readings:
John Stuart Mill, Burke, Rousseau, and Marx himself. I dropped it faster than lightning. I thought I was going into a class that had a reduction of bias, not a clear delineated leftist Marxist bias! Subjection of women? Please! Women have done what women needed to do as much as men have done what men needed to do for centuries. Yes there was a time where men thought women could not and were not able to be as great as a man, that time has passed, but does that mean we should 'let women have a turn as everything men have been'? No. Why? Because men are not the primary child-carers in this world, it is women, and that is something sacred, as much as it is sacred for many men to provide monetarily for their family and be dominant in strength and influence onto his household. A fair, patriarchal father will raise stoic, clever and destructively pristine daughters and emotionally control his wife so she does not embarrass herself during PMS rampages, and/or kill their newborn because she's frustrated over the top.
Inequality has a bad rep on the left like feminism does on the right. Why? Because inequality is good and natural. People just don't like the sound of it. But everything is inequal and the most powerful thing we can do about it is treat others with respect and integrity. I'm a Christian (although my faith in punishment and God is dwindling recently due to logic prominence) but I am a follower of Jesus, who claimed that all persons were equal in the eyes of God, and if you're secular or an atheist, God can mean the Universe. And it's true. Women are better at certain things than men are. My husband is an egalitarian and when my son was born, he had a difficult time to find him cute and to handle him and feel secure in the way that he would take care of him. He did his best but it did not come naturally, unlike me. My son was born and he was very cute for a newborn, but I found him gorgeous despite his newbornness and I slaved away happily to him, because that's what women have always done. I also don't like physical games as much as my husband, and this, once more, is natural and evolutionary. I comfort better. My husband rough and toughs better.
Do I believe that women CAN do everything a man can? Yes. Do I believe that women should not be oppressed in any circumstance by men? Yes. Do I believe that we should break traditional gender roles and family models in order to liberate the woman sexually and socially from the role of mother and child-carer, home-maker (proved to be the most fulfilling job for women), and role model? NO! That's what make me anti-feminist, but I still hold the majority of the feminist ideologies, not because of feminism, but because of Jesus. Early Christianity had powerful women who ran churches and they spread a message of gender EQUITY, which is what it should be.
Anyway, fuck my University. I'm still going to write that bitching Honours on SJW's though and I'm going to blow my professor out of the park. I won't convert (((him))) to the Alt-Right, but I might temporarily embarrass him for being so biased.
These are the required readings:
John Stuart Mill, Burke, Rousseau, and Marx himself. I dropped it faster than lightning. I thought I was going into a class that had a reduction of bias, not a clear delineated leftist Marxist bias! Subjection of women? Please! Women have done what women needed to do as much as men have done what men needed to do for centuries. Yes there was a time where men thought women could not and were not able to be as great as a man, that time has passed, but does that mean we should 'let women have a turn as everything men have been'? No. Why? Because men are not the primary child-carers in this world, it is women, and that is something sacred, as much as it is sacred for many men to provide monetarily for their family and be dominant in strength and influence onto his household. A fair, patriarchal father will raise stoic, clever and destructively pristine daughters and emotionally control his wife so she does not embarrass herself during PMS rampages, and/or kill their newborn because she's frustrated over the top.
Inequality has a bad rep on the left like feminism does on the right. Why? Because inequality is good and natural. People just don't like the sound of it. But everything is inequal and the most powerful thing we can do about it is treat others with respect and integrity. I'm a Christian (although my faith in punishment and God is dwindling recently due to logic prominence) but I am a follower of Jesus, who claimed that all persons were equal in the eyes of God, and if you're secular or an atheist, God can mean the Universe. And it's true. Women are better at certain things than men are. My husband is an egalitarian and when my son was born, he had a difficult time to find him cute and to handle him and feel secure in the way that he would take care of him. He did his best but it did not come naturally, unlike me. My son was born and he was very cute for a newborn, but I found him gorgeous despite his newbornness and I slaved away happily to him, because that's what women have always done. I also don't like physical games as much as my husband, and this, once more, is natural and evolutionary. I comfort better. My husband rough and toughs better.
Do I believe that women CAN do everything a man can? Yes. Do I believe that women should not be oppressed in any circumstance by men? Yes. Do I believe that we should break traditional gender roles and family models in order to liberate the woman sexually and socially from the role of mother and child-carer, home-maker (proved to be the most fulfilling job for women), and role model? NO! That's what make me anti-feminist, but I still hold the majority of the feminist ideologies, not because of feminism, but because of Jesus. Early Christianity had powerful women who ran churches and they spread a message of gender EQUITY, which is what it should be.
Anyway, fuck my University. I'm still going to write that bitching Honours on SJW's though and I'm going to blow my professor out of the park. I won't convert (((him))) to the Alt-Right, but I might temporarily embarrass him for being so biased.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)