Liberalism is Masochism

Masochism seems to be very popular amongst the liberal youth of today. There is a strange paradox between what they do, what they believe and what they say. Liberals say what they feel, demand unique treatment to fit their emotional differences, and often act out in righteous indignation when they think 'society' has gone too far. Activism is now a must for the liberal who feels like everything they live in unfair. Feminists think it is unfair that they live in a patriarchy. Blacks think it is unfair that they live in a majority white country (and call is supremacy, which is sort of is as well and they obviously see that as wrong). Activist behaviour, however, in of itself is masochistic since you're wasting your life thinking you're changing things 

Liberals are ethnomasochists
There isn't anything better than some white guilt in the morning! This is a given but ethnomasochism has its own issues, including cultural masochism, national hate, disdain for the Right, and unnatural trained attraction toward other races. Anti-white sentiment is prominent in liberals to do indigenous studies, African studies, women's studies, gender studies and even politics.

Liberals are mental/moral masochists 
You hear liberals talk about mental health a lot. I've known people who made up mental health problems so much that in order to keep any form of identity and integrity they had to continue lying about it or lose face completely. SJW's are continuously being triggered and feeling depressed and sad. I used to be this and I know why. They're continuously projecting their indulgences and degeneracy into other degenerate people in order to receive validation. Much like how atheists will circlejerk with other atheists etc (everyone circlejerks a bit) liberals will usually only attempt to find other pure liberals who accept all the things they need to accept. The fringe liberals are the 'real' liberals, the radicals basically, since being a liberal but not accepting the radical view makes you this un-liberal person. To me, there isn't any use attempting to be liberal unless you're fully into it, and then that just makes you completely insane and secluded from the rest of the world. People are generally conservative with liberal undertones here and there--for example, even Christians can be nice and tolerant of gays. Liberalism demands people to accept and tolerate anything that comes out of it, anything that the human is capable of doing not only need acceptance and tolerance but understanding and validation.
They do it to themselves in the end. Liberals are highly hypocritical--they think that they can preach one thing and then turn around to do the opposite without consequences. They don't really understand what having an identity is, what it is to set yourself up for a long-term ride. They're short-term pleasure-seekers in the first place, they're artists on welfare, bisexual polyamourous feminists, cucks thinking masculinity is dead, and older men who want younger women to suck their cock after they've screamed their lungs out against the non-existent rape culture. They're moral relativists, they don't care what people do as long as it doesn't hurt in the short term.
Sooner or later, they crack. They have depression due to getting into vicious cycles of sadness and anger, of anxiety and lack of continuity. They have no moral compass, no God, no integrity and they wonder why they're not functional and demand the government to give them disability checks, or they want dogs to follow them everywhere because they've forced themselves into agoraphobia.

Masochistic Feminist Anecdote (because it's almost tragic how hypocritical this is)

This young woman once told me she was raped after meeting a guy online and then going to his house. Yes, clearly it was the most stupid idea in the world, but she said it was his fault, which it was. She blamed it on her lack of intelligence (also true) but then after becoming a feminist and an extreme liberal, realized that nothing was her fault and it was all his fault. She told me this in order to shock me and she did, I turned into a feminist for a few weeks. This was what jumpstarted me into the Alt-Right, funny enough. We spoke here and then about feminist issues and then she told me she used Tinder in order to find fuck dates and then would go to their place or invite them over and have sex with them. I was confused. I told her 'aren't you afraid of them after what happened?' She said: 'No, I trust men despite everything.' Fair enough. She trusts random strangers from Tinder to come over to her place and have sex with her as good men who see her as a human being and not an easy free prostitute. But then she said something like this: 'I mean, when I'm horny, I want to fuck. I'm not going to go through the whole 'date' process. I just want them to come over and fuck me.' This made me sick to my stomach, as she had often done to me with her rape story and her projections and conspiracies about rape culture. It took a while for me to realize that her mentality was a female version of the mentality her rapists had about himself and about her. She kept on telling me 'rapists are usually very charming'. No, rapists are usually very liberal, very fake, very desperate. Charming Reactionaries be like: let's read Mein Kampf and make Biblical connections! XD But I was shocked. She didn't even learn anything from being raped. She didn't learn humility. She only learned that she was a victim and will always be a potential victim of men. Her existence was the perfect cess pool  to breed a feminist worldview, because she chose to be a liberal. A symptom of being raped is prostitution; for her, it was a valid lifestyle, and she to this day, continues to meet and fuck dozens of people (I mean, probably women too) in order to feel alive, in order to connect with her rapists so that she can empathize with him and continue to degrade her spirit by reliving her experience and fetishizing it over and over again under the guise of tolerance, accepting and validation. Now that's masochism.

Social Monopolies

Feminism does not have a monopoly on equality. Equality is often defined as 'the equal opportunity for a woman to make the same choices and decisions as a man'. Often Marxists will attempt to easily convert people to feminism by using the phrase 'who believes that a woman should have the equal opportunities?' Clearly if you don't raise your hand under that sort of pressure, (even if you could explain your reasoning) you will be socially ostracized.

Social ostracism is not a big deal for men, but for women, it is. I hate confrontation, I think it's a man's thing, but I will take my place if it is needed. I say it's not a big deal for men because men thrive in the public sphere, often do not bend to emotional mindgames as easily, remain stable while defending their arguments and gain friends and babes from being outgoing and sometimes fringey. Women don't do as well. A right-wing woman in a Marxist college will be looked at contemptuously by leftist men and women, and since the right-wing men are in a minority, she's left on her own, which is a difficult weight to bear.

With PC culture, women lose. 

Trudeau and Iceland

http://conservativefans.com/2016/07/26/trudeau-says-hes-moving-to-iceland-if-trump-wins/

"Iceland is the most peaceful country in the world" says Trudeau who then added that it was an ideal place for one to raise his children.

So, it's satire, but a lot of people took it very seriously. Was it created in order to stir discussion about white identity and white supremacy? If it did, well, let's stir the stew and throw some posts why don't we?

96% of the population of Iceland is pure, milk-drinker white. You wonder why there is so much peace? Is it the secular government? The egalitarian society (with authoritarian males, of course)? The hygge? The Norse blood? The fair and just legal system?

Iceland isn't perfect, what with allowing a lesbian to be their Prime Minister and gay marriage, but let's be honestly, it is a paradise compared to Canada and the US. And you might think gay marriage is fine, Iceland is after all, founded on a Christian basis that has been secularized. It is probably better to let homosexuals be happy than have them constantly in rebellion, pushing back against normalcy. I do think that when homosexuality is more tolerated it has less a chance to be fetishized, but I remain against gay marriage. I mean, why? These days, although it still bothers me, I've come to accept romantic relationships between same-sex partners, intimate relationships. Daniel Tammet has a male partner that he has claimed is more like a soft lover (although they are married) than someone to satisfy his lust on. We can argue about Greek ideals of beauty and male love another day, but I think that homosexuality should be about soft love if ever homosociality is just not enough.

Religious Extremism is not Religious Terrorism

I've been hearing this apologetic phrase recently, mainly coming from the regressive left and atheists, "religious extremism" or "religious extremist". They're often used to describe the motivation of a terrorist attack without implying that the person is a terrorist. For the normies out there, this does not equate to the dangerous ideology of Islam, but says that all religions can be extreme and can be murderous and can lead to terrorism. Clearly this is an understatement. Moderate Christians in this world are those who accept gay marriage and abortions. Fundamentalist Christians, or as they would say 'religious extremist Christians' will go to Pro-Life rallies, not accept homosexuality as a valid form of sexuality, and might even not use contraception. That's religious extremism.

What about Islam? Just the moderate Muslims agree with what ISIS is doing. They don't like homosexuals, at all, they want segregation, they don't think any other religion is legitimate and believe that many other races than their own are lesser. That's not even the extremists. In the extreme you have female genital mutilation, the murder of homosexuals, the rape of infidels, the murder of infidels, death for apostasy, child marriages and the list goes on.

Clearly this 'religious extremism' narrative the left is pushing is a form of Cultural Marxism, destroying the fabric of our society one uttered word of black magic at a time. It is an apology of the real terrorism that is threatening Europe, that is violently raping our beautiful Swedish and German women, that is reducing our populations through abortion, that is blinded by pride and the vehement hate of continuity, goodness, and the achievement of greatness. 

My posts will be short like this for a while, I'm on vacation! Have a beautiful deep summer, my Lords.

Food for Thought

If America (Canado-American culture) is so corrupt... why do people want to immigrate here? We're a rape culture. We are patriarchal and non-equal. We are sexually repressed and way too traditional. Wow, it sounds like a great fucking place for Muslims, does it?

Moral Objectivism: Keeping Things Right and Wrong

When morality is flexible, people start to decide for themselves what is right and what is wrong. If there is no authority on morality (such as a higher authority, like God, for example) then people themselves can decide what is good and what is not good. Religions follow God(s) that give them the life lessons and morality they need in order to live a happy and fulfilled life. But when morality is dictated by humans, by their experiences and their feelings, things can become chaotic. The embodiment of evil, Satan you could call it, wants chaos. He wants people to decide for themselves what is good and what is evil. If a pedophile thinks it feels 'right' to have sex with a youth, and the youth seems to like it as well, is it immoral? The child could be pampered and trained and think that its reality is fine and dandy, but is it? Who is to tell? Are the negative psychological backlash of the child the reason behind dictating if the acts/relationship is moral or immoral? If you would arrest the man and take him away from his young lover, and the youth would protest and weep for the loss of her loved one, could you make an exception to a rule? The answer is simple: We do not have any objective marker in the human being that enables us to claim any authority on morality. Society and other people tend to want to change morality for convenience sake, for pleasures' sake, for love's sake. While love is beautiful and important, it is also horrible and breaking: love, while love can be infinitely good and bountiful, it does not serve as a moral marker.

Healthy Sexuality: Self-Rape

When you look up self-rape on the internet, you usually get a lot of 'Christian Woman calls 911 on her 9-year-old son who was masturbating' Well, I'm here to tell you that there is a clear difference between self-rape and self-sexuality.

Traditionalists and a bit of Jesus

This might come off as really mean, but think of this. All those gender-queer, trans-whatever people who don't want kids and won't have kids because they're going to have their sexual organs removed, their genes are going to die. Those who will have children will be what trans-queer-gender-different and feminists call "traditionalists". These "traditionalists" are men who like women who want children and a family, and women who like men who want children and a family. These people come together and share their lives, so that they can have moral support from the loyal, loving partners, as well as time-sharing, so that the most work can be done the most efficiently. Team work makes the dream work and trust me, it does. What pisses me off and numerous people around me about this is that it is almost shunned by women and 'free women' and feminists that I don't sleep with many people, or have a career. I have a baby son, and people would ask me as I am heavily pregnant if I was going to have an abortion. When I denied them, frowning, (because I'm way too pregnant for you to be asking me this and to be asked that when you are waiting for your baby miracle is like being asked someone when they're going to murder their own child. When?) they were shocked! You're 22! You're just starting your life and you want to have responsibility?

Rape Statistics and Rape Culture

This is a very solid article that challenges the rape statistics in our culture.
http://time.com/3393442/cdc-rape-numbers/
I want to make things clear.

Youtube Anti-Feminism

I'm not a man, but I've seen a lot of men on the internet react violently to extreme waves of modern feminism. You've probably heard of TJ, the Amazing Atheist, or Sargon of Akkad, Thunderf00t and others of the same genre. What I mainly have to say about these men is that they are all individuals, reacting differently to the same thing. What we must understand is that they are reacting in a way that shows no restraint. One may be more emotional, one may be a bit more satirical and the other simply rational. They are the voices of groups of people, (who watch them and make them famous) and most of those fans are male, but some are female, who have problems with feminism, and especially extreme feminism that appears on social media.

Why not Feminism? On what I cannot fathom in this Ideology

I am a woman. I am a mother. I live in Canada, in Quebec, in a reasonably-sized city, but nothing near the hugeness of Montreal. Over the years, I've lived my life very normally. I wasn't really religious or anything, but I went into Religion in University and ended up doing a major. I am in an environment presently that challenges my views on God and religion very deeply. I have numerous friends who are atheists and who cannot understand religion or 'spirituality'. I have issues with these things myself, and recently, I've been having more and more issues on gender.

I'm not into Gender Studies, or anything of the likes, but I am bombarded every single day with hardcore feminist attitudes and to reciprocate these attitudes are male, (usually atheist) egalitarians who have no problem with normal feminism, but who have a difficult time understanding why women feminists are so extreme about 'feminist' issues.

To cut it short, I've made a list of things I cannot fathom concerning Feminism: