CNN Reporter Sally Kohn's Lesbianic Pedophilia

In this absolutely vile and disgusting article, Sally Kohn projects her sexual feelings toward another woman onto her daughter (not sure if adopted or biological). She lives in an uppity neighbourhood surrounded by rich white people and probably suffers 0% intolerance from her neighbours because what's lesbianism when you're rolling in a pool of greed and sin already?

She desires her daughter to be a lesbian. This is the most disgusting thing I've ever read, and yet, it echoes feelings I used to have when I was an insane SJW who fetishized homosexuality. It's clear that she does--she's an SJW (and Jewish). A few years ago, I wished to have children in the future and I wished them to be gay, simply because I thought it was 'cooler' and more 'rebellious' to be gay, also easier since no pregnancies would arise.

But apart from the dewy-eyed otaku-like feelings one has for gays in their teenhood and early adulthood, when a mature adult wishes their own child to be sexually attracted to not only the same-sex but in the same sexual structure as they are, that's projection and it has sinister pedophilic undertones. Why does Kohn even obsess over her 6-YEAR-OLD's sexuality like this? I'm thinking she's probably fantasized about her sexually. Homosexuals these days accept all of their sexual feelings for whatever, they embrace them and they even humanize and valorize pedophiles, so it's clear that for her to be able to be a lesbian and have this identitarian ideology of acceptance, she has to accept that she wants her daughter to be a lesbian BECAUSE she has sexual feelings for her. It's this weird double-think where she cannot deny and suppress her sexual lesbian feelings for her young daughter because it would be 'bad' emotionally, and therefore 'accepts' it, but refuses to lose face and admit that she's a pedophile, so twists it around and makes it all about the 6-year old. Ugh.

Lesbians have projected onto me in the past. I've spoken about them in numerous other posts, but they attempted to make me into a sexual degenerate by claiming that because I had enjoyed making out with a girl in college that I was bisexual and that I should be allowed to have a polyamourous relationship with a woman in my already-built family life. I never wanted to be a lesbian, even when I fetishized the concept--being with a woman was always 'weird' in the end to me, and I never cared about social pressure, so I know it came all of from me. Well, I cared about social pressure when I became a conservative, because I understood its use.

People born in wealth are born in vice. Many SJW's are high middle class people who value personal, individual growth but not in a healthy way, in a hedonistic, debauched kind of way that is far from God, or a secular version of potential actualization. Sally Kohn is born in the nepotistic-dynasty of 'God's chosen people' and has Original Sin flowing in her veins. She proudly asserts her degeneracy, refuses to humble herself in front of the Lord and nature itself and posts this God-awful article in the Washington Post.

This is a really 'homophobic' post compared to this last one I wrote, which was much more moderate and 'rational', but there is just something tragic about the children of lesbians or gays. It's not family, it's not right, it's not sacred, it's a perversion and an abomination and it breaks my heart.

LGBT Marriage

 I've updated this post recently. My views have changed and I no longer agree with much of what I've said here but I will not delete it because I think this is good rationalization. Still, for society as a whole and my own integrity, I cannot allow homosexuality to be validated and even less homosexual marriage. You can see the update here.

I'm not sure what to think about gay marriage. I'm not sure what to think of homosexual relationships in general. Like I'm said numerous times before, I think being sexually deviant is a form of lust. I don't think we should see people as 'gay' or 'straight', I think there is reproductive sexuality (man and woman) and then there are masturbatory practices that can happen between two people. I think gays and lesbians who want to marry are sexually active with each other and believe themselves spiritually bonded and therefore desire 'marriage'. What homosexuals don't seem to understand about marriage is that it's a religious act, it's an the bonding between two people to share the entirety of life together, and ultimately, to start a family. Is having a family necessary? Not really. You could focus on having a career, I guess. Gay men have a leg up in being non-family-oriented and career-focused, but still, what would you do with all the money you would accumulate? Move up the tiers of society? Buy a house for yourself? I guess you could adopt children and have a dog and live the life of a nuclear family. Same with lesbians. I just don't see how fulfilling it is to be with someone of your own sex.

You do your school, you have lots of lesbian/gay sex, sexual activity until your libido goes away, and then you move in together, get married, and then just live a career life and use your money for your own life. You travel, you set up a business selling something stupid, maybe if you're financially smart, you'll invest some money, but... where will that money go? I guess it could go to your adopted children, who'll have the privilege of having two moms or two dads, as if that's normal. Let's spread out the options for a married gay couple:

1. You live a 'normal' life, but you're gay. You adopt kids. You work your jobs. You live in a suburban neighbourhood.

2. You live a 'lonely' life, with no children, and a self-centered mutual partnership where your souls are bonded into the everlasting individual chaos that you believe in. If you are knowledge-oriented, you could take the time to be workaholic scientists or something useful.

3. You open up your marriage, you explore lust on a continuum, you focus all of your energy on your sexuality, on social justice activism, on forcing Christians to make cakes for you and attempt to open up Christianity to homosexuality.

On the Spiritually-Minded Left

The left is often devoid of spirituality. They have the Wiccans and the Neopaganists and the pseudoscientific and the hypocritical protestants and Catholics, but their spirit comes through in the way they view people.

Neoreactionaries often use archetypes and stereotypes in order to talk about race and sex. It's a flaw we're all aware of, but it is also the acknowledgement that those archetypes and stereotypes are real. It is true that black children without a steady family life and a father to discipline them, may become violence and out-of-control more so than a white child of that same circumstance. Black neighbourhoods are not devoid of anything safe and nice because of 'institutionalized racism' or 'systems of oppression' they are as such because blacks men have been proven to have more testosterone and "war is to man what motherhood is to women" seems to be deeply rooted in the minds of the black male.

But I digress. There are other numerous instances where the left uses spirituality in order to make their arguments. The one, about men and women. Feminists and SJW's believe that men and women are the same. They have the same brain, the same wants and desires, the same emotional responses, responsibilities and truths, life goals, etc etc etc. The reality is that men and women are vastly different. What all human should acknowledge, however, is that despite the differences between men and women, they should both be treated with respect and dignity. They should not suffer from any form of poor treatment because of their sex. (I have apologized for misogyny and have heard numerous examples that defend misogyny has a a natural occurent in society today due to the high level of violence boys and girls face from frustrated mothers in a society that hates motherhood and mothers, but also because of women being straight-up insane. Feminists may have misandric feelings, the important thing here is to be self-aware). But in trying to make men and women equal in every respect, we are saying that women and men SHOULD react the same way for every situation. But they won't. A woman who will be cheated on will be infuriated at the cheater and the one he cheated on her with. A man who will be cheated on will often be far more self-critical and think it was his fault. This can be really damaging for any relationships he will have in the future and of his view of women. Women in a bad relationship or many with men, can become a lesbian, easily. A man will not become gay if he has bad relationships with women.The point is that men and woman are extremely different from each other, our responses are different, our strengths are in different places and to expect a young man not to get an erection when a beautiful girl is teasing the hell out of him is nonsensical. The spirit of the human is stronger than the sex of that person, to the left. It is, they're right, but it takes a large amount of control and it is a life-long process. We still, however, remain our XX and XY's until the end of our days. Sex IS gender.

Fetishization

The two worst things you can subject an idea to is to romanticize it or to fetishize it. Fetish in this definition is "something irrationally revered" (OED), which I will explain furthermore by saying that is it often put into action in order to gain more from it than what it has to offer. It is a projection of the flesh onto the spirit, it is a delusion, a perversion, and it usually leads to obsession. The most common association to fetish that humans face is the fetishism of food and sexuality.

Romanticization is "To make romantic or idealized in character; to make (something) seem better or more appealing than it really is; to describe, portray, or view in a romantic manner." (OED) Things that are romanticized are usually horrible and disturbing evils (and sometimes fetishes) in order to sidle through the human's natural gut-reactions to evil, tweak their moral compass and invade their mind. Common romanticizations that I've witnessed that are the most disturbing are Japanese anime collections called Loli, of small female children willingly open to be sexual with adult men. The romanticization of female children as whimsical, innocent and pure beings makes it all the more easy to create a pedophilic narrative in one's mind that seems harmless and caring instead of perverted and predatorial. Thug life is often romanticized as well, making it seem noble and honourable when it is clearly more like a forced engagement of evil, violence and ultimately rape and murder. 

Morality: Restriction or Indulgence?

A critique of conservative stances on morality, or religious stances are that they are restrictions forced onto people by those who refuse to accept their differences. A preacher with homosexual feelings will adamantly obsess over the passages in the Bible that claim homosexuality to be wrong because it valorizes his work of suppressing and sublimating his feelings into God. But this is a subjective view. Sublimating lust into God is difficult and is part of an ascetic life. In our corrupt society, it's difficult for those who struggle with lust because they are bombarded with porn, softcore porn, child pornification, basically there is sex and lust everywhere one looks. In the end, it doesn't really matter how people see this 'theory of moral restrictions' because their view is subjective. A subjective view of a subjective view is pretty weak and useless when we are on a quest toward finding an objective morality.

Mothers are Women, Girls are Girls

When I was pregnant, two years ago, I told a woman in my class that I really felt like I was becoming a woman. She looked at me funny and said: "Surely you don't mean that women need to have children to be women...?"
I felt undermined and insulted, because she was a feminist and I knew what she stood for but not completely at the time. I had to be subdued. It bothered me.

What is Race Superiority?

We won't all agree on the definition, but this is what I find important when a race claims to be better than another. Race, for this definition, will encompass culture as well.

1. A race cannot bring another race down to support its claim of superiority
 To use another race to boost your race is to prove weakness. A race that need the support of other races is not superior, but exploiting the strengths of one race in order to appear better. American whites have the same burden to blacks as German whites have to Jews. I know there probably aren't that many Jews living in Germany anymore, but the idea of reparations is cute and beautiful but it's not going to happen. We're not the society we were then. We're not the people that our ancestors were. But years have passed since the American chattel slavery, and society has shifted quite a bit since then. Black people now have complete equality, it's up to them to choose to live as a victim of the past or as an individual who has perfect agency and who will prove to the 'white man' that she can be as culturally savvy, controlled, intellectual and in love with the freedom she has in the West.

Freethought and Leftist Buzzphrases Mindcontrol

Abracadabra: "I say what I create"  --Ancient Magic.

Now, don't get me wrong here, I don't personally become offended by something someone tells me, but when something does happen, it gives me insight to the effects this culture and world, especially the secular/mainstream world, is having on their minds. I've noticed that a lot of leftists use certain words in order to control your thoughts or to shut down your thought process. A lot of leftists cannot think outside of themselves. Self-interest is one of the main priorities of the majority of the mainstream leftist thought. They're selfish children who think nationality is 'silly' and that it should be okay to mock Religious people openly, on social media and in public. These are a few things they tend to say:

Women Power is Not In Feminism--It's in Conservatism

There is a minority of activist women in America who identify as Christian (seriously) and/or Conservative. They want to reclaim the word 'feminist'. Personally, on a side-note, I would like to coin the word Femalist, those who care about the female sex, about reproduction, female beauty, humility and sacrifice. These feminists call third-wave mainstream feminists 'fauxminists' as they devaluing the true nature of women. Now I'm not going to make an argument from nature, because that's an endless cycle of bullshit. I'm going to make the argument from God. Woman arose from the earth. Female. She who bears fruit in her womb.

Food for Thought

If America (Canado-American culture) is so corrupt... why do people want to immigrate here? We're a rape culture. We are patriarchal and non-equal. We are sexually repressed and way too traditional. Wow, it sounds like a great fucking place for Muslims, does it?

Moral Objectivism: Keeping Things Right and Wrong

When morality is flexible, people start to decide for themselves what is right and what is wrong. If there is no authority on morality (such as a higher authority, like God, for example) then people themselves can decide what is good and what is not good. Religions follow God(s) that give them the life lessons and morality they need in order to live a happy and fulfilled life. But when morality is dictated by humans, by their experiences and their feelings, things can become chaotic. The embodiment of evil, Satan you could call it, wants chaos. He wants people to decide for themselves what is good and what is evil. If a pedophile thinks it feels 'right' to have sex with a youth, and the youth seems to like it as well, is it immoral? The child could be pampered and trained and think that its reality is fine and dandy, but is it? Who is to tell? Are the negative psychological backlash of the child the reason behind dictating if the acts/relationship is moral or immoral? If you would arrest the man and take him away from his young lover, and the youth would protest and weep for the loss of her loved one, could you make an exception to a rule? The answer is simple: We do not have any objective marker in the human being that enables us to claim any authority on morality. Society and other people tend to want to change morality for convenience sake, for pleasures' sake, for love's sake. While love is beautiful and important, it is also horrible and breaking: love, while love can be infinitely good and bountiful, it does not serve as a moral marker.

Cultural Marxism and the Anti-Christian Movement

Cultural Marxism is a form of applied Marxism that is projected onto culture and society. It is broken down and all parts that are less valorized in society get labeled 'oppressed' while the parts that are valorized are labeled 'oppressor'. This is much like intersectional feminism, where different groups are targeted and then activated for/toward through the media, politics, and the general social atmosphere. However, certain people have thought that Cultural Marxism was a term used to demonize "feminists, homosexuals, secular humanists, multiculturalist, sex educators, environmentalist, immigrants, and black nationalists."

It is surprising to see how much of this agenda is anti-Christian, or, perhaps not surprising at all.
Let's break down the pieces:

Proud of Being Straight--Writing and Homosexuality in Teenhood

I'll admit it, I'm proud of being straight. This might come off as hate speech for some, but that's Cultural Marxism and we don't need that here. We don't need that ever. But I'm going to have one of those stories for you all. If you are a straight person and always were, that's great! If you were not always in understanding with your sexuality, we can perhaps both share in this text I shall write for you together.

I won't be sharing really negative things that have happened to me, but I will share an umbrella understanding that I've come to realize over the years.