I know this is over-dealt with but I can never keep in the thought: what have men not done that women could do? Why do we need to 'let women try to rule the world'? Saying that means that people believe women to be superior to men that men have not done what needs to be done, that men have been lacking, that they've missed something. This is very difficult to believe. I doubt women will bring anything new to the table--if things go well for women in power, the best thing that could happen would be that women will keep the status quo that men have fought and died to obtain and conserve.
What about black women? I watched this video and it made me think about what it would be like to pass the baton not only to women but to black women. I've read a lot on how black women act and why they act in a clownish fashion, videos by black men who claim that black women compensate for their lack of beauty and popularity with acting in order to get people's attention. Black women will do anything to stand out, be seen as different and unique hence the attitude and bizarre over-the-top emotions and reactions. Leslie Jones was the epitome of this stereotype in the movie Ghostbusters. Nero called the act racist to the level of minstrels (black face) and I have to agree. Black women appropriate this because it is a very real stereotype, archetype even at this point. What I find ridiculous is what white male announcer (virtue-signalling cuck) says to her:
"A lot of people starting attacking you on Twitter using some pretty awful terminology and I was very proud of you, knowing you, you'd stand up for yourself when that happened, and then you used Twitter as a form (forum?) to draw attention to it and uhh um... maybe this is going to be the beginning of some progress towards what happens on Twitter."
First of all... he's barely literate. Is he trying to lower himself to her level? At one point refers to her indirectly by saying "people like you". Way to other blacks in the left by cloaking yourself in virtue. The beginning of progress? No, it's the continuation of the coddling. It's the rise of censorship, of a big government and a police state. But we know all this. This is clearly a bad interview and the whole Leslie Jones issue is stupid. It's just interesting to see what kinds of things would likely happen if black women were in power. White men would cuck themselves into attempting to to just to minorities who, if ever they grab a hold of the train that runs society, would crash it on purpose and then claim justice, freedom and hope.
Showing posts with label cuck. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cuck. Show all posts
Sunday, 11 September 2016
Wednesday, 13 July 2016
O'Canada--The Cuckland
Justine Trudeau, former substitute high school drama teacher, has decided to go full retard feminist and change the lyrics to 'O Canada' to be gender neutral. I say it was because insecure feminists were being triggered. I'm going to give three reasons why this is a bad idea.
1. Justin is a cuck and now Canada is a cuck. While the left boasts about how 'good' we look to the 'rest of the world', realistically, the rest of the world is either being controlled by the wealthy and the 0.01% or is an ultra-masculine Middle East that wants to rape Canada. Already that Justin Trudeau doesn't value his land and sells each log from our precious forests for 0.50$ each (disgusting!), he also doesn't care at all about his people because there was no democratic vote on the anthem change. I know a lot of people hated the change and that's disrespectful to your people. While Justine thinks he's doing the right thing, he keeps on saying things like 'It's the current year' and 'We're on the right side of history'. Cuck country of the West will also be harbouring Syrian refugees and I SWEAR as soon as they come here, I am carrying pepper spray and a switch blade around with me and will be encouraging girls to do so. I don't want to fearmonger, but after Germany and Sweden... you fucking touch my milky skin, and I'll shiv you. Anyway, *fluffs hair* it's a bad idea because it demeans the actual desires of the population and the change was undemocratic and ideological--while there should be a separation of church and state, feminism, as an ideology, should be considered a religion and therefore the change of the Canadian anthem is almost a religious change.
2. No one cares about the 'sons' in the song because we're white westerners and 50% of the population are women. We're pretty fucking safe, we're one of the safest country in the world. Just because people have sexual insecurities and feel raped by their choices doesn't make 1 in 4 college women raped. We don't live in an oppressive patriarchy. The patriarchy of the feminist is a real bogeyman, it's not real. We are in a patriarchy, but the workings and understandings of that statement is too difficult and complex for the mind of the SJW. This is a pragmatic reason: no one cares or feels empowered in a patriarchal way--or feels oppressed by the lack of the female gender apart from feminists who want female supremacy (which leads to the end of a civilization).
3. The hardliner, the motherload, here it is: sons are in command of a nation and should be. If women would rule nations, nations would fall. Mother Merkel is committing German suicide, and the migrants coming in her country and raping young girls are all reading Mein Kampf. Matriarchies have happened, but only at the end of Empires right before their total downfall. Theodora of Byzantium promoted the liberation of women and sexual empowerment (not in the same ways as feminists due today) and it was suitable for a dying Empire only. Well, we are in a dying Empire, unless Trump can do something about it. This reason is uncomfortable but true: women should not play a role in the building and the upkeeping of a nation. But should focus their energy on raising children, caring for the sick, the young and the elderly. I want men to rule. I don't even want to vote anymore--I'll end up voting conservative next election, fuck, I'd take Harper back!
Also, and this is a postscript reason but it sounds terrible. In all of us command? Who wrote it? It sounds awful and disturbing and stupid, and embarrassing.
1. Justin is a cuck and now Canada is a cuck. While the left boasts about how 'good' we look to the 'rest of the world', realistically, the rest of the world is either being controlled by the wealthy and the 0.01% or is an ultra-masculine Middle East that wants to rape Canada. Already that Justin Trudeau doesn't value his land and sells each log from our precious forests for 0.50$ each (disgusting!), he also doesn't care at all about his people because there was no democratic vote on the anthem change. I know a lot of people hated the change and that's disrespectful to your people. While Justine thinks he's doing the right thing, he keeps on saying things like 'It's the current year' and 'We're on the right side of history'. Cuck country of the West will also be harbouring Syrian refugees and I SWEAR as soon as they come here, I am carrying pepper spray and a switch blade around with me and will be encouraging girls to do so. I don't want to fearmonger, but after Germany and Sweden... you fucking touch my milky skin, and I'll shiv you. Anyway, *fluffs hair* it's a bad idea because it demeans the actual desires of the population and the change was undemocratic and ideological--while there should be a separation of church and state, feminism, as an ideology, should be considered a religion and therefore the change of the Canadian anthem is almost a religious change.
2. No one cares about the 'sons' in the song because we're white westerners and 50% of the population are women. We're pretty fucking safe, we're one of the safest country in the world. Just because people have sexual insecurities and feel raped by their choices doesn't make 1 in 4 college women raped. We don't live in an oppressive patriarchy. The patriarchy of the feminist is a real bogeyman, it's not real. We are in a patriarchy, but the workings and understandings of that statement is too difficult and complex for the mind of the SJW. This is a pragmatic reason: no one cares or feels empowered in a patriarchal way--or feels oppressed by the lack of the female gender apart from feminists who want female supremacy (which leads to the end of a civilization).
3. The hardliner, the motherload, here it is: sons are in command of a nation and should be. If women would rule nations, nations would fall. Mother Merkel is committing German suicide, and the migrants coming in her country and raping young girls are all reading Mein Kampf. Matriarchies have happened, but only at the end of Empires right before their total downfall. Theodora of Byzantium promoted the liberation of women and sexual empowerment (not in the same ways as feminists due today) and it was suitable for a dying Empire only. Well, we are in a dying Empire, unless Trump can do something about it. This reason is uncomfortable but true: women should not play a role in the building and the upkeeping of a nation. But should focus their energy on raising children, caring for the sick, the young and the elderly. I want men to rule. I don't even want to vote anymore--I'll end up voting conservative next election, fuck, I'd take Harper back!
Also, and this is a postscript reason but it sounds terrible. In all of us command? Who wrote it? It sounds awful and disturbing and stupid, and embarrassing.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)